Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic, which shook the whole world, has changed the traditional work behavior patterns of both employers and employees. The adaptation of organizations to new systems such as flexible working hours and working from home has brought problems such as work-life imbalance, although it is seen as in favor of employees. The concept of “quiet quitting” which means spending minimum effort and taking less responsibility in the workplace, has become an increasingly crucial agenda for employees, employers, and governments. This study aims to reveal what quiet quitting is, its similarities and differences with related concepts in the literature, and its causes and consequences theoretically. This study has provided important implications in terms of addressing the concept of quiet quitting in depth in the literature and pioneering future studies.
Reference66 articles.
1. Addae, H. M., Praveen Parboteeah, K., & Davis, E. E. (2006). Organizational commitment and intentions to quit: An examination of the moderating effects of psychological contract breach in Trinidad and Tobago.
International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 14(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/19348830610823419
2. Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49(11), 1395-1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604901102
3. Argyris. C. & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
4. Bacal and Associates (2022). Toxic Organizations - Welcome to the fire of an unhealthy workplace. http://work911.com/articles/toxicorgs.htm.
5. Bagheri, G., Zarei, R., & Aeen, M. N. (2012). Organizational silence (basic concepts and its development factors). Ideal Type of Management, 1(1), 47-58.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献