Street names are sources of versatile information. With names, locations get meaning and turn into places. Correct reading of streets names, which are text, will make a significant contribution to the urban identity. In this study, streets, boulevards and road names in Erzurum are evaluated within the framework of the principles of toponymy. The names of streets and boulevards were taken from the Ministry of Finance Revenue Administration. Using multiple approaches such as remembering and, critical toponymy, Aliağaoğlu and Uzun (2011) typology is used. When you look the point of view of the Erzurum city, congress, old country longing and walls of the fortification gate are added. Individual names are the most important street name. This is related to the cities being' man-made settlements. The other streets respectively are the other, friendship-fraternity, place orientation and republican streets. The historical and natural heritage, the process of nationalization, the use of urban land, the effect of political power, the security conditions and the urban growth are the main reasons for the formation of urban toponymy in Erzurum.-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Street names are sources of versatile information. With names, locations get meaning and turn into places. Correct reading of streets names, which are text, will make a significant contribution to the urban identity. In this study, streets, boulevards and road names in Erzurum are evaluated within the framework of the principles of toponymy. The names of streets and boulevards were taken from the Ministry of Finance Revenue Administration. Using multiple approaches such as remembering and, critical toponymy, Aliağaoğlu and Uzun (2011) typology is used. When you look the point of view of the Erzurum city, congress, old country longing and walls of the fortification gate are added. Individual names are the most important street name. This is related to the cities being' man-made settlements. The other streets respectively are the other, friendship-fraternity, place orientation and republican streets. The historical and natural heritage, the process of nationalization, the use of urban land, the effect of political power, the security conditions and the urban growth are the main reasons for the formation of urban toponymy in Erzurum.

Published:2018-12-15 Issue: Volume: Page:1-1
ISSN:1301-5265
Container-title:Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Uzun Alper,Arslan Ferhat

Publisher

Balikesir Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi

Reference1 articles.

1. Akova, İ. (2016). Enerji Kullanımındaki Değişimler. Ankara: Nobel. Akpulat, O., Sayman, R. Ü. ve Cordova-Novion, C. (2012). Atık Yakma Direkti (2000/76/EC) Düzenleyici Etki Analizi, REC, Türkiye. Altıkat, A., Ekmekyapar Torun, F. ve Turan Bayram, T. (2011). Küresel Kirlilik: Dünya, Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye’de Hava Kirliliği Örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27 (2), 134-149. Atalay, İ. (1997). Türkiye Coğrafyası. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi. Avcı, S. (2005). Türkiye’de Termik Santraller ve Çevresel Etkileri. İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Coğrafya Bölümü Coğrafya Dergisi. 13, 1-26. Braunholtz, S. (2003) Public Attitudes to Windfarms: A Survey of Local Residents in Scotland. Edinburgh: MORI Scotland, for Scottish Executive Social Research. Dear, M. (1992). Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, 288–300. Devine-Wright,P. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an Integrated Framework for Understanding Public Perceptions of Wind Energy. Wind Energy, 8, 125–139. Doğan, M. (2011). Enerji Kullanımının Coğrafi Çevre Üzerindeki Etkileri. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi. 23, 36-52. Doğanay, H. (1998). Ekonomik Coğrafya 2, Enerji Kaynakları. Erzurum: Şafak Yayınevi. Doğanay, H. ve Coşkun, O. (2017). Enerji Kaynakları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı. (2018). Elektrik, http://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Elektrik, Erişim Tarihi: 02.07.2018. Eren, Z. ve Budak, D. B. (2012). Kırsal Alanda Yaşayan Bireylerin Rüzgâr Enerji Santralleri Hakkındaki Düşünceleri: Hatay İli Örneği. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 28 (1), 91-100. Garipağaoğlu, N. (2015). Türkiye Ortam Sorunları Coğrafyası. İstanbul: Yeditepe. Hermansson, H. (2007). The Ethics of NIMBY Conflicts, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (1), 23-34. Karabulut, Y. (2004). Türkiye’de Elektrik Enerjisi Üretimi. Ankara Üniversitesi Türkiye Coğrafyası Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Dergisi. 3 (58). s. 53 -77. Kraft, M. B. ve Clary, B. B. (1991). Citizen Participation and the NIMBY Syndrome: Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal. The Western Political Quarterly, 44 (2), 299-328. Lorcu, F. (2015). Örneklerle Veri Analizi SPSS Uygulamalı. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. Makina Mühendisleri Odası. (2018). Türkiye’nin Enerji Görünümü 2018. Yayın No: MMO/691. https://www.mmo.org.tr/sites/default/files/EnerjiGorunumu2018_1.pdf Palabıyık, H., Yavaş, H.ve Aydın, M. (2010). Nükleer Enerji ve Sosyal Kabul Sorunu: NIMBY Sendromu Üzerine Bir Kritik Bir Literatür İncelemesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15 (1), 45-66. Ren21. (2017). Renewables 2017 Global Status Report. http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/17-8399_GSR_2017_Full_Report_0621_Opt.pdf Swofford, J. ve Slattery, M. (2010). Public Attitudes of Wind Energy in Texas: Local Communities in Close Proximity to Wind Farms and Their Effect on Decision-Making. Energy Policy, 38, 2508–2519. Tümertekin, E. ve Özgüç, N. (1997). Ekonomik Coğrafya. İstanbul: Çantay Kitabevi. van der Horst, D. (2007). NIMBY or Not? Exploring the Relevance of Location and the Politics of Voiced Opinions in Renewable Energy Siting Controversies. Energy Policy, 35, 2705–2714. Warren, C. R., Lumsden, C., O’Dowd, S., Birnie, R.V. (2005). Green on Green’: Public Perceptions of Wind Power in Scotland and Ireland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48, 853–875. Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Innovation:An Introduction to The Concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683-2691. Yalçın, Ö. (2009). Ekolojik İkilemlere İlişkin Tutum, Toplumsal Sorumluluk ve Yabancılaşmanın Toplumsal Değer Yönelimi Açısından İncelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Silopi Termik Santrali Yakınlarındaki Tarım Alanlarında, Farklı Uzaklık ve Derinlikteki Toprakların Bazı Ağır Metal İçeriklerinin Araştırılması;Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi;2023-12-28