Governing the COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia: Shifting Capacity under a Fragmented Political Leadership

Abstract

Drawing on a variety of material—mass and social media texts, government reports, and everyday observations—this article examines two interrelated dynamics in Malaysia in 2020–2021: the COVID-19 pandemic's unfolding local trajectory and the short-lived Perikatan Nasional (PN) coalition's governance capacity. Despite political instability resulting from this government's rise to power following internal political manouevrings, it managed to e ectively control a major wave of cases with the help of a centralized healthcare system manned by permanent professional sta and the imposition of coercive measures. Thus, Malaysia's success in "governing" the early phase of the pandemic is arguably attributable to its strong state infrastructure, notwithstanding the untimely unfolding of this political coup. However, an ideal type approach—that is, concern with state capacity—is inadequate in making sense of subsequent failures to control the pandemic after a state election took place several months later. Using Migdal's "state-in-society" approach, this article focuses on the political process of pandemic governance to shed light on Malaysia's shifting state capabilities. Arguably, the resulting shifting responses were mainly shaped by: (1) continuous partisanship; (2) PN's internal fragmentation; (3) PN's complacency in initially "flattening the curve"; and (4) poor governance during the state election.