2021 SAEM Consensus Conference Proceedings: Research Priorities for Implementing Emergency Department Screening for Social Risks and Needs

Author:

Yore Mackensie1,Fockele Callan2,Duber Herbert2,Doran Kelly3,Cooper Richelle4,Lin Michelle5,Campbell Steffani6,Eswaran Vidya7,Hong Haeyeon8,Gbenedio Kessiena9,Stanford Kimberly8,Gavin Nicholas10

Affiliation:

1. VA Los Angeles and UCLA National Clinician Scholars Program, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System HSR&D Center of Innovation, Los Angeles, California

2. University of Washington, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington

3. NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Population Health, New York, New York

4. UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles, California

5. Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford, California

6. UCSF Fresno, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fresno, California

7. Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine and Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Houston, Texas

8. Boston Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

9. Columbia University, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, New York

10. Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, New York

Abstract

Introduction: Despite literature on a variety of social risks and needs screening interventions in emergency department (ED) settings, there is no universally accepted or evidence-based process for conducting such interventions. Many factors hamper or promote implementation of social risks and needs screening in the ED, but the relative impact of these factors and how best to mitigate/leverage them is unknown. Methods: Drawing on an extensive literature review, expert assessment, and feedback from participants in the 2021 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference through moderated discussions and follow-up surveys, we identified research gaps and rated research priorities for implementing screening for social risks and needs in the ED. We identified three main knowledge gaps: 1) screening implementation mechanics; 2) outreach and engagement with communities; and 3) addressing barriers and leveraging facilitators to screening. Within these gaps, we identified 12 high-priority research questions as well as research methods for future studies. Results: Consensus Conference participants broadly agreed that social risks and needs screening is generally acceptable to patients and clinicians and feasible in an ED setting. Our literature review and conference discussion identified several research gaps in the specific mechanics of screening implementation, including screening and referral team composition, workflow, and use of technology. Discussions also highlighted a need for more collaboration with stakeholders in screening design and implementation. Additionally, discussions identified the need for studies using adaptive designs or hybrid effectiveness-implementation models to test multiple strategies for implementation and sustainability. Conclusion: Through a robust consensus process we developed an actionable research agenda for implementing social risks and needs screening in EDs. Future work in this area should use implementation science frameworks and research best practices to further develop and refine ED screening for social risks and needs and to address barriers as well as leverage facilitators to such screening.

Publisher

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Subject

General Medicine,Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3