Proceedings from the 2021 SAEM Consensus Conference: Research Priorities for Interventions to Address Social Risks and Needs Identified in Emergency Department Patients

Author:

Kraynov Liliya1,Quarles Aaron2,Kerrigan Andrew3,Mayes Katherine4,Mahmoud-Werthmann Sally5,Fockele Callan6,Duber Herbert6,Doran Kelly7,Lin Michelle8,Cooper Richelle9,Wang Nancy5

Affiliation:

1. Valleywise Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona

2. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

3. University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles, California

4. Harvard Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

5. Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford, California

6. University of Washington, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington

7. NYU School of Medicine, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Population Health, New York, New York

8. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, New York

9. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, UCLA Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency departments (ED) function as a health and social safety net, regularly taking care of patients with high social risk and need. Few studies have examined ED-based interventions for social risk and need. Methods: Focusing on ED-based interventions, we identified initial research gaps and priorities in the ED using a literature review, topic expert feedback, and consensus building. Research gaps and priorities were further refined based on moderated, scripted discussions and survey feedback during the 2021 SAEM Consensus Conference. Using these methods, we derived six priorities based on three identified gaps in ED-based social risks and needs interventions: 1) assessment of ED-based interventions; 2) intervention implementation in the ED environment; and 3) intercommunication between patients, EDs, and medical and social systems. Results: Using these methods, we derived six priorities based on three identified gaps in ED-based social risks and needs interventions: 1) assessment of ED-based interventions, 2) intervention implementation in the ED environment, and 3) intercommunication between patients, EDs, and medical and social systems. Assessing intervention effectiveness through patient-centered outcome and risk reduction measures should be high priorities in the future. Also noted was the need to study methods of integrating interventions into the ED environment and to increase collaboration between EDs and their larger health systems, community partners, social services, and local government. Conclusion: The identified research gaps and priorities offer guidance for future work to establish effective interventions and build relationships with community health and social systems to address social risks and needs, thereby improving the health of our patients.

Publisher

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Subject

General Medicine,Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3