Abstract
This paper examines the overall child development and approaches to child development and suggested a framework for constructing a curriculum that enhance the whole child learning process relevance to learning theories. In addition to assess the child activities in and out of the classroom and school. It has been examined from the developmental approaches of child that it is essential to concern the theories and approaches to child development for making a framework of creative and comprehensive curriculum. The theories and approaches of Jean Piaget, Bruner, Erikson and Hoffnung have discussed in the paper. Generally three major domains of development (Physical, cognitive, and psychosocial) are discussed in relevance to above mentioned psychologists. Concerning upon the stages and development of child a framework for comprehensive curriculum has made. Furthermore, the paper suggested the construction of Child-centered curriculum. In construction of the curriculum, the content and material required for comprehensive curriculum has been added in the paper. The very first thing is to make it research and theories based, a good curriculum must have specific goals and objectives, the interest level of children should be observed first and include materials afterword, the role of the teacher, family engagement and concerning the disable children are the main considerations of comprehensive and creative curriculum.
Reference20 articles.
1. American Psychological Association. (2021). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index
2. Astington, J.W. (2004). Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. London, GB: Oxford University Press.
3. Atifnigar, H., & Alokozay, W. (2020). Postgraduate Students Perceptions toward StudentCentered Learning (SCL): A Study of Afghan Postgraduate Students at TESL-University Technology Malaysia. International Journal of Management and Humanities, 4(7), 115–119.
4. Atifnigar, H., Alokozay, W., & Takal, G. M. (2020). Students’ perception of alternative assessment: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(4), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.4.22
5. Atifnigar, H., Alokozay, Wahidullah, Zaheer, Z., & Takal, G. M. (2020). Students’ Perception of Alternative Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(4), 228–240. Atifnigar, H., Bawar, H., Momand, M., & Hamid, S. A. A. (2022). Oral Participation Practices in Classroom among University Students in Afghanistan. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 409–420. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21865