Author:
Jha Abhay Kumar,Parihar R.S.,Sisodia Tarun Veer Singh,Misra Rajesh,Kumar Barun
Abstract
Researchers are continuously studying the properties and functionality of cement and other aggregates, which are made from a combination of modern materials and different waste. In the current study, a series of experiments were conducted to compare the use of three different types of mixes. In the first mix, amorphous silica was used in place of cement; in the second, Waste Ceramics was used in place of sand; and in the third mix, both materials were combined to create concrete of M20 grade. These materials were used in place of cement and sand in varying amounts, such as 0%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 30%. The properties analyzed were workability by Slump cone and the compressive strengths after 3, 21, and 28 days. The main conclusions is the addition of amorphous silica affects consistency and setting time, as well as increasing compressive strength up to a certain limit. However, it has been observed that workability of concrete increases with the combined use of Amorphous Silica and Waste Ceramic Tiles. Compressive strength: It has been observed Maximum C3 compressive strength is found at 20% replacement of cement with Amorphous Silica after 3, 21 and 28 days of curing. Maximum compressive strength is found at 20% replacement of sand with Waste Ceramics after 3, 21 and 28 days of curing. Maximum XV compressive strength is found at 20% replacement of both cement and sand after 3, 21 and 28 days of curing. Compressive strength of concrete mix was increased slowly when both the chief ingredients were replaced by Amorphous Silica and Waste Ceramic Tiles. Split tensile strength at 3 days, 21 days and 28 days increased up to 20% and then decreases. Flexural strength at 3 days, 21 days and 28 days increased up to 20% and then decreases.
Reference19 articles.
1. Aliabdo, A., Abd, E. & Auda, E. (2014). Re-use of waste marble dust in the production of cement and concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 50, 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.005
2. Aruntaş, H.Y., Gürü, M., Day M., & Tekin, I. (2010). Utilization of waste marble dust as an additive in cement production. Materials and Design, 31(8), 4039–4042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.036
3. ASTM. (2003). ASTM C618-03 Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use as a Mineral Admixture in Concrete, American Society for Testing and Materials.
4. Barbhuiya, S. A., Gbagbo, J. K., Russell, M. I., & Basheer, P. A. M. (2009). Properties of fly ash concrete modified with hydrated lime and Amorphous Silica. Construction and Building Materials, 23(10), 3233-3239. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2009.06.001
5. Bijen, J. (1996) Benefits of Slag and Fly Ash. Construction and Building Materials, 10, 309-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(95)00014-3