Beyond Accuracy: Building Trustworthy Extreme Events Predictions Through Explainable Machine Learning

Author:

Mukendi Christian Mulomba,Itakala Asser KasaiORCID,Tibasima Pierrot MutebaORCID

Abstract

Extreme events, despite their rarity, pose a significant threat due to their immense impact. While machine learning has emerged as a game-changer for predicting these events, the crucial challenge lies in trusting these predictions. Existing studies primarily focus on improving accuracy, neglecting the crucial aspect of model explainability. This gap hinders the integration of these solutions into decision-making processes. Addressing this critical issue, this paper investigates the explainability of extreme event forecasting using a hybrid forecasting and classification approach. By focusing on two economic indicators, Business Confidence Index (BCI) and Consumer Confidence Index (CCI), the study aims to understand why and when extreme event predictions can be trusted, especially in the context of imbalanced classes (normal vs. extreme events). Machine learning models are comparatively analysed, exploring their explainability through dedicated tools. Additionally, various class balancing methods are assessed for their effectiveness. This combined approach delves into the factors influencing extreme event prediction accuracy, offering valuable insights for building trustworthy forecasting models. 

Publisher

AMO Publisher

Reference47 articles.

1. Abdulali, B.A., Abu Bakar, M.A., Ibrahim, K., & Ariff, N.M. (2022). Extreme Value Distributions: An Overview of Estimation and Simulation. Journal of Probability and Statistics, 2022, 5449751. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5449751

2. Salehi, A.W., Khan, S., Gupta, G., Alabduallah, B.I., Almjally, A., Alsolai, H., Siddiqui, T., & Mellit, A. (2023). A Study of CNN and Transfer Learning in Medical Imaging: Advantages, Challenges, Future Scope. Sustainability, 15(7), 5930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075930

3. Tewari, A., Izquierdo García-Faria, T. & Coma, C. (2018). Model Agnostic Methods for Interpretable Machine Learning. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32824.03842

4. Ayuningtyas, R. & Koesrindartoto, D.P. (2014). The Relationship between Business Confidence, Consumer Confidence, and Indexes Return: Empirical Evidence in Indonesia Stock Exchange. In International Conference on Trends in Economics, Humanities and Management (ICTEHM’14) Aug 13-14, 2014 Pattaya (Thailand). International Centre of Economics, Humanities and Management.

5. Aravindpai, P. (2020). Analyzing Types of Neural Networks in Deep Learning. Retrieved from https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2020/02/cnn-vs-rnn-vs-mlp-analyzing-3-types-of-neural-networks-in-deep-learning/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3