Abstract
The question of how the government would ensure water supply for its people while protecting the environment remains a challenging endeavour. Emerging water resource management challenges have driven governments to reform governance policies. This includes the introduction of formal institutions of water management. Additionally, the Tanzanian government adopted Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) frameworks. However, evidence indicates that establishing formal institutions (which replaced the informal ones) has achieved little in improving water supply and ensuring sustainable water management. This study asks what is still needed to achieve sustainable water management in Tanzania. Using a systematic literature review, the study examined the experience of water resources management in Tanzania, particularly the formal institutions. The study found that formal institutions have been unable to ensure sustainable water resources management; they have weakened the informal institutions and attracted water conflicts. The study calls for considering and integrating the informal institutions (that have been serving communities for generations) in water resources management initiatives.
Reference44 articles.
1. Awuah-Nyamekye, S. (2009). Salvaging Nature: The Akan Religio-Cultural Perspective. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 13, 251-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/136352409X12535203555713
2. Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Fourth Edi. edited by K. Hanson. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Boesen, J., Maganga, F.P., & Odgaard, R. (1999). Norms, organisations and actual practices in relation to land and water management in Ruaha River Basin, Tanzania. In: Granfelt, T. (Ed.), Managing the Globalised Environment. Intermediate Technology Publications. London.
4. Bryant, R & Bailey, S. (1997). Third World Political Ecology. London: Routledge.
5. Cleaver, F. (2002). Moral Ecological Rationality, Institutions and the Management of Common Property Resources. Development and Change, 31, 361-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00158