Author:
Li Bei,Ran Ma ,Xia Peng,Zhang Tingting,Yang Meidi,He Jinbo,Yong Qin ,Ning Xiaoming
Abstract
Background & Objective: Headache is a common symptom and disease. Cervicogenic headache (CH) is a common type of headache that can be effectively treated with both manual therapy (MT) and dry needling (DN). However, the results of MT plus DN (MDN) for CH remain controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of MDN for CH.
Methods: A systematic search from database inception to June 1, 2023 on clinical outcome of MDN and MT in the treatment of CH was conducted. Four databases were searched, including Pubmed (Medline), Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library related randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Main outcomes included numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) in the post-treatment, the first month and the third month, extension and flexion in the post-treatment, headache frequency in the first month and the third month, neck disability index (NDI) in the first month and the third month.
Results: Three studies involving 263 patients out of 68 studies were conducted. The pooled data showed that there was significant differences in NPRS in the post-treatment, the first month and the third month, extension in the post-treatment, flexion in the post-treatment between MDN group and MT group, but there was no statistically significant difference in the headache frequency in the first month and the third month, NDI in the first month and the third month.
Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that MDN may be superior to MT in improving NPRS, extension, and flexion.
Publisher
ASEAN Neurological Association