Affiliation:
1. Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of RAS; Ural State Mining University
2. Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of RAS
Abstract
Digitalization and digital transformation of companies have turned from global trends to an urgent need. Thanks to digitalization and digital transformation, organizations can overcome the times of crisis, the times of lockdowns with less losses and respond more effectively to any adverse changes in the external environment. The assessment of the level of digitalization and digital transformation allows to determine how fast the processes of introducing digital technologies and optimizing processes with digital solutions proceed, both in companies and across the industry as a whole. The article provides an analysis with the systematization of foreign and domestic methods, methodological approaches, methods for assessing the digitalization level and digital transformation, as well as reveals their positive and negative aspects. Based on a comparative analysis, an improved author-developed methodological toolkit is proposed for assessing the level of digitalization and digital transformation, alleviating the disadvantages of the existing methodological experience. The approbation of the author-developed methodological toolkit was performed using the oil and gas industry as an example; the following companies, being the industry leaders, were analysed: PJSC “Lukoil”, PJSC “NK “Rosneft”, PJSC “Gazprom”, and PJSC “Tatneft”. According to the results, the digitalization and digital transformation processes of the domestic oil and gas industry are insufficiently dynamic. It was found that in the period from 2016 to 2020, the Russian Federation industry leaders were in the following order from the most advanced to the least advanced in terms of the digitalization level and digital transformation: PJSC “Gazprom” topped the list; PJSC “NK “Rosneft” was second; PJSC “Lukoil” was the third largest company, and PJSC “Tatneft” held the fourth position.
Publisher
National University of Science and Technology MISiS
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Process Chemistry and Technology,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference43 articles.
1. Gordina V. Difficulties in exploration oil projects in the Arctic. URL: http://pro-arctic.ru/17/04/2018/ resources/31616#read (Accessed: 12.06.2022)
2. Nasibulin M.M. Fuel and energy complex of Russia: digitization. Neftegaz.RU. 2020;(4):19–24. (In Russ.) URL: https://magazine.neftegaz.ru/upload/iblock/59c/59ce2d2f0ca1e25d1f29c1daadebb2c4.pdf (Accessed: 12.06.2022)
3. Kashirsky A. S., Kirichenko Y.V. World ocean as the last reserve of mankind. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2017;(1):67–76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2017-1-67-74
4. Alifirova E. Gazprom Neft created the industry’s first digital model of the Achimov formation. URL: https://neftegaz.ru/news/Geological-exploration/197900-gazprom-neft-sozdala-pervuyu-v-otrasli-tsifrovuyumodel-achimovskoy-tolshchi/ (Accessed: 12.06.2022)
5. Kovalenko A. Oil with intelligence. Expert Ural. 2018;(38). (In Russ.) URL: http://www.assoneft.ru/activities/press-centre/tek/5164/ (Accessed: 12.06.2022)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献