Abstract
Is it time to reconsider radical housing struggles? This is the main question animating the article, in the light of telling evidence from Abidjan’s contemporary evictions, where dwellers put in place a plethora of practices against their displacement, from collective to individual ones. The study builds on Abidjan’s eviction programs under the SDUGA (Schéma Directeur d’Urbanisme Grand Abidjan) to pick up three urban scenarios of neighbourhoods’ reaction to precarity, considering data from scientific and administrative papers, press review, and interviews and participant observations. Conventional and non-conventional forms of reaction to eviction in the three case studies inform a more dynamic reading of the concept of radicality. A radicality referred to the aim and not to the outcome of a struggle, a subjective concept belonging to the perception of those who struggle, an objective feature that shares a semantic familiarity with the essential core of the oppressive force.
Reference61 articles.
1. Accornero, G. (2021) Contentious buildings: The struggle against eviction in NYC's Lower East Side. Current sociology, 1-19.
2. Politiques de l'expulsion : acteurs, enjeux, effets;Aguilera;L Année sociologique,2018
3. « On ne mange pas les ponts et le goudron » : les sentiers sinueux d'une sortie de crise en Côte d'Ivoire;Akindès;Politique africaine 148(4),2017
4. Amon D'Aby, F.-J. (1951) La Côte d'Ivoire dans la cité africaine. Paris : Larose.
5. Awenengo Dalberto, S. & Banégas, R. (2018) Citoyens de papier : des écritures bureaucratiques de soi en Afrique. Genèses, 112(3), 3‑11.