Affiliation:
1. Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod
Abstract
The development of botanical science and the improvement of methods used to identify the boundaries of species lead to constant changes in the criteria and volume of species in various systematic groups of plants. Currently, to solve these problems, modern methods of geno- and chemosystematics (for example, use of PCR, ITSS, and other markers), methods of discriminant and factor analyses, assessment of boundaries of ecological and climatic niches of different species, approaches of chemosystematics and metabolomics are used. However, the emergence of a large number of different modern approaches to estimate the volume of species has not simplified the task of plant taxonomists. Instead, it gave them the task to select or reasonably combine reliable methods. The latter would allow to progress in solving this difficult tasks and set priorities for the development of an integrated methodological approach to the study criteria and volumes of species.
Publisher
Ukrainian Theriological Society of NASU
Reference18 articles.
1. Dietrich, W., W. Wagner, P. H. Raven. 1998. Systematics of Oenothera section Oenothera subsection Oenothera (Onagraceae). Systematic Botany Monographs, 50: 1–234.
2. Ereshefsky, M. 2001. The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: a Philosophical Study of Biological Tax-onomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–316.
3. Hudziok, G. 1968. Die Oenothera-Arten der sudlichen Mittelmark und des angrenzenden Flamings Verh. bot. Ver. Prov. Brandenb., 105: 73–107.
4. Kitcher, P. 1984. Species. Philosophy of Science, 51 (2): 308–333.
5. Kornet, D. J., J. W. McAllister. 2005. The composite species concept: a rigorous basis for cladistic per-spective. In: Reyden T. A. C., Hemerik L. (eds). Current Themes in Theoretical Biology: a Dutch perspective. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 95–128.