Abstract
Zoogenic impact plays a critical role in stream processes, especially bank stability and resulting channel dynamics. This study focuses on bioturbation by groundhogs (Marmota monax) along the riparian zone of Mill Creek (Bucks County, Pennsylvania, USA). Several complexes comprising at least 32 active burrows (average diameter: 25.9 cm) were geolocated, with morphometric measurements obtained at selected sites. Two networks were imaged using high-frequency 800 MHz ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and included: 1) a grid of parallel 3-m-long transects on the south bank, and 2) an 11-m-long profile on the north bank. Post-processed electromagnetic signal traces (A-scans) comprising 2D radargrams (B-scans) revealed voids as reverse-polarity anomalies (hollow inclined shafts and tunnels), allowing for a general assessment of burrow depth and orientation. At the southern cutbank site, a large burrow had an entrance diameter of 0.3 m and a westerly dip. A sloping tunnel section was detected at ~0.5 m depth, based on the geometry of point-source (transverse) hyperbolic diffractions corresponding to the roof and a floor ‘pull-up’. The second locality traversed three open burrow entrances adjacent to large tree roots. This survey along a tributary channel shows multiple hyperbolics below adjacent openings, with the latter showing the characteristic signal ‘breakout’. GPR data show hyperbolic signatures ~0.3–0.4 m below the ground surface. Along this transect, burrowing activity appears to increase with proximity to the northern bank of Mill Creek. An example of a depth slice (bedding-plane view) from a nearby riverbank demonstrates the potential for 3D visualization (C-scans) of burrow networks using a grid of closely spaced GPR profiles. Groundhog burrows constrain maximum long-term level of the groundwater table and serve as important zoogeomorphic structures in diverse ecotones, including developed landscapes. Abundant evidence of bank slumping, incision, and treefall suggests that burrowing activity likely weakens root systems and enhances groundwater flow, thereby initiating or accelerating geomorphic cascades leading to slope failure.
Publisher
National Museum of Natural History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Reference25 articles.
1. Armitage, K. B. 2003. Marmots: Marmota monax and Allies. In: Feldhamer, G. A., B. C. Thompson, J. A. Chapman (eds). Wild Animals of North America Biology, Management, and Conservation, (2nd ed.). The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 188-210.
2. Biavati G., M. Ghirotti, E. Mazzini, G. Mori, E. Todini. 2008. The use of GPR for the detection of non-homo¬geneities in the Reno River embankments (north-eastern Italy). In: Locat, J., D. Perret, D. Turmel, D. Demers, S. Leroueil (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Canadian Conference on Geohazards : From Causes to Management. Presse de l'Université Laval, Québec, 1-594.
3. Butler, D. R. 1995. Zoogeomorphology - Animals as geomorphic agents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1-240. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529900
4. Buynevich, I. V. 2011. Buried tracks: ichnological applications of high-frequency georadar. Ichnos, 18: 189-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10420940.2011.632300
5. Buynevich, I. V. 2023a. Neoichnology of vertebrate traces along the western barrier coast of Ukraine: preservation potential and subsurface visualization. GEO&BIO, 24: 99-105. https://doi.org/10.15407/gb2407