Surveillance of the spread of avian influenza virus type A in live bird markets in Tripoli, Libya, and determination of the associated risk factors
-
Published:2022-07-16
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1684-1690
-
ISSN:2231-0916
-
Container-title:Veterinary World
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vet World
Author:
Kammon Abdulwahab1ORCID, Doghman Mosbah2ORCID, Eldaghayes Ibrahim3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Poultry and Fish Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya; National Research Center for Tropical and Transboundary Diseases, Alzintan, Libya. 2. Department of Poultry and Fish Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya. 3. Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Studies on avian influenza virus (AIV) in Libya are few and limited. This study aimed to determine the presence of AIV in live bird markets (LBMs) in Tripoli and determine the risk factors associated with AIV spread.
Materials and Methods: In total, 269 cloacal swabs were randomly collected from different bird species in 9 LBMs located in Tripoli and its surrounding regions. The target species were ducks, geese, local chickens, Australian chickens, Brahma chickens, turkeys, pigeons, quails, peacock broiler chicks, and pet birds. Total RNA was extracted from the swab samples and used for real-time polymerase chain reaction to detect AIV type A.
Results: Of the 269 samples, 28 (10.41% of total samples) were positive for AIV type A. The LBMs with positive samples were Souq Aljumaa, Souq Alkhamees, Souq Althulatha, and Souq Tajoura. The highest percentage (35.71%) of AIV was recorded in Souq Aljumaa. Positive results for AIV type A were obtained primarily in three species of birds: Ducks (14/65; highest percentage: 21.5%), local chickens (12/98; 12.24%), and geese (2/28; 7.14%). Furthermore, the following three risk factors associated with the spread of AIV type A were identified: Time spent by breeders/vendors at the market (odds ratio [OR] = 11.181; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.827–32.669), methods used for disposing dead birds (OR = 2.356; 95% CI = 1.005–5.521), and last visited LBM (OR = 0.740; 95% CI = 0.580–0.944). Restricting the movement of poultry vendors from one market to another may protect against AIV spread.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate the high risk of AIV spread in LBMs and highlight the need for continuous surveillance of LBMs across the country.
Publisher
Veterinary World
Subject
General Veterinary
Reference41 articles.
1. Chang-Won, L. and Yehia, M.S. (2009) Avian influenza virus. Comp. Immun. Microbiol. Infec. Dis., 32(4): 301–310. 2. Kammon, A., Heidari, A., Dayhum, A., Eldaghayes, I., Sharif, M., Monne, I., Cattoli, G., Asheg, A., Farhat, M. and Kraim, E. (2015) Characterization of avian influenza and Newcastle disease viruses from poultry in Libya. Avian Dis., 59(3): 422–430. 3. Fournié, G., Guitian, F.J., Mangtani, P. and Ghani, A.C. (2011) Impact of the implementation of rest days in live bird markets on the dynamics of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza. J. R. Soc. Interface., 8(61 ): 1079–1089. 4. Wang, X., Wang, Q., Cheng, W., Yu, Z., Ling, F., Mao, H. and Chen, E. (2017) Risk factors for avian influenza virus contamination of live poultry markets in Zhejiang, China during the 2015-2016 human influenza season. Sci. Rep., 7(1): 1–9. 5. Cardona, C., Yee, K. and Carpenter, T. (2009) Are live bird markets reservoirs of avian influenza? Poult. Sci., 88(4): 856–859.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|