Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Veterinary Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Tick-borne pathogens such as Babesia canis, Hepatozoon canis, and Ehrlichia canis can cause serious disease in canines. Each blood parasite can be associated with different hematological characteristics in infected dogs. Identification of hematological alterations during routine laboratory screening of blood samples from dogs displaying clinical signs is essential for diagnosing blood parasitic infections. This study aimed to evaluate parasitic infections and hematological alterations in blood samples of infected dogs in Southern Thailand.
Materials and Methods: A total of 474 blood samples were collected from dogs presented at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the Prince of Songkla University between 2016 and 2019. An automatic hematology analyzer was used to establish hematological values; peripheral blood films were screened for blood parasites and their detection was associated with hematological alterations to determine the odds ratio (OR).
Results: This study found that E. canis (n=127) was the most common blood parasite infecting dogs in southern Thailand, followed by H. canis (n=100) and B. canis (n=24). Hematological alterations caused by Ehrlichia infections included anemia, thrombocytopenia, monocytosis, and eosinophilia (OR=14.64, 17.63, 20.34, and 13.43, respectively; p<0.01). The blood samples of Hepatozoon-infected dogs were characterized by anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, neutrophilia, and monocytosis (OR=6.35, 3.16, 12.80, 11.11, and 17.37, respectively; p<0.01). Anemia, thrombocytopenia, eosinopenia, and lymphopenia (OR=10.09, 33.00, 20.02, and 66.47 respectively; p<0.01) were associated with B. canis-infected dogs.
Conclusion: These data support the fact that hematological abnormalities are a hallmark for the identification of tick-borne infections. The hematological values, hereby reported, can be used as a guideline for the clinical diagnosis of canine blood parasitic infections in Southern Thailand.
Funder
Prince of Songkla University
Reference37 articles.
1. Shaw, S.E., Day, M.J., Birtles, R.J. and Breitschwerdt, E.B. (2001) Tick-borne infectious diseases of dogs. Trends Parasitol., 17(2): 74-80.
2. Dantas-Torres, F. (2008) Canine vector-borne diseases in Brazil. Parasit. Vectors, 1(1): 25.
3. Solano-Gallego, L., Sainz, Á., Roura, X., Estrada-Peña, A. and Miró, G. (2016) A review of canine babesiosis: The European perspective. Parasit. Vectors, 9(1): 336.
4. Kaewmongkol, G., Rukkwamsuk, T., Sirinarumitr, T., Songserm, T., Tipsawake, S. and Jittapalapong, S. (2004) Prevalence survey of Babesia canis in stray dogs in Bangkok using PCR technique. J. Kaset Vet., 14: 24-33.
5. Piratae, S., Pimpjong, K., Vaisusuk, K. and Chatan, W. (2015) Molecular detection of Ehrlichia canis, Hepatozoon canis and Babesia canis Vogeli in stray dogs in Mahasarakham Province, Thailand. Ann. Parasitol., 61(3): 183-187.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献