Effects of second litter syndrome on reproductive performance in sows
-
Published:2024-08
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1680-1684
-
ISSN:2231-0916
-
Container-title:Veterinary World
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vet World
Author:
Nam Nguyen Hoai1ORCID, Khoudphaithoune Thepsavanh1ORCID, Lanh Do Thi Kim1ORCID, Thanh Nguyen Van1ORCID, Truong Nguyen Duc1ORCID, Toan Nguyen Cong1ORCID, Dung Bui Van1ORCID, Dao Bui Tran Anh2ORCID, Sukon Peerapol3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal Surgery and Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam. 2. Department of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam. 3. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand; Research Group for Animal Health Technology, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Abstract
Background and Aim: The effects of second litter syndrome (SLS) on subsequent reproductive performance remain poorly understood. This study examined the impact of SLS on reproductive parameters such as piglets born alive (PBA), accumulative number of PBA (APBA), farrowing interval (FI), and risk of decreased PBA (DPBA) up to parity 5.
Materials and Methods: Data on 5,464 litters were recorded from 1,507 sow cards collected on five swine farms in northern Vietnam. A linear mixed-effect model was used to analyze the effect of SLS on the PBA, APBA, and FI. A generalized linear mixed model was used to analyze the effect of DPBA in parity n on the risk of DPBA in parity n + 1.
Results: About 47.8% of the sows contracted SLS (720/1507). Only APBA1-2 was significantly decreased by SLS. The APBA3-5 in SLS sows was comparable to that in non-SLS sows (41.8 vs. 41.9). Non-DPBA2 upped the risk for DPBA3 by 3.6-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8–4.6). Moreover, non-DPBA3 increased the risk of DPBA4 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7, 95% CI = 2.1–3.7), and non-DPBA4 increased the risk of DPBA5 (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 2.3–4.7). The risks of developing DPBA4 and DPBA5 remained unchanged following SLS (p > 0.05). About 98.4% of sows underwent PBA fluctuations during their first five parities.
Conclusion: SLS does not appear to detrimentally affect PBA, APBA, and FI in subsequent parities. Therefore, SLS sows do not necessarily have future low reproductive performance or be culled. Future investigations should explore the mechanism of alternate decrease/increase patterns in PBA.
Keywords: piglets born alive, reproductive performance, second litter syndrome.
Publisher
Veterinary World
Reference30 articles.
1. Gustina, S., Pasau, S.N., Sukoco, H. and Hasbi, H. (2023) Reproductive performance of pig based on age of the sows and litter size. Glob. Acad. J. Agric. Biosci., 5(4): 82–85. 2. Ju, M., Wang, X., Li, X., Zhang, M., Shi, L., Hu, P., Zhang, B., Han, X. and Wang, K. (2021) Effects of litter size and parity on farrowing duration of Landrace × Yorkshire Sows. Animals (Basel), 12(1): 94. 3. Kramarenko, A.S., Ignatenko, Z.V., Lugovoy, S.I., Pidpala, T.V., Karatieieva, O.I., Yulevich, O.I., Artyuhova, O.V. and Kramarenko, S.S. (2020) Effect of parity number, year and season farrowing on reproductive performance in Large White pigs. Ukr. J. Ecol., 10(1): 307–312. 4. Andersson, E., Frössling, J., Westin, R., Algers, B. and Gunnarsson, S. (2020) Associations between litter size and medical treatment of sows during farrowing and lactation. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A Anim. Sci., 69(3): 176–182. 5. Kobek-Kjeldager, C., Larsen, M.L.V. and Pedersen, L.J. (2023) Changes in piglet and litter characteristics across parities in two highly prolific sow hybrids in an outdoor organic herd. Anim. Sci. J., 94(1): e13840.
|
|