Molecular survey and interaction of common respiratory pathogens in chicken flocks (field perspective)
-
Published:2019-12
Issue:12
Volume:12
Page:1975-1986
-
ISSN:2231-0916
-
Container-title:December-2019
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vet World
Author:
Abdelaziz Adel M.1, Mohamed Mahmoud H. A.2, Fayez Mahmoud M.3, Al-Marri Theeb4, Qasim Ibrahim5, Al-Amer Abdul Aziz4
Affiliation:
1. Veterinary Educational Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt; Department of Avian Diseases, Al Ahsa Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, Saudi Arabia. 2. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia; Department of Avian and Rabbit Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt. 3. Al Ahsa Veterinary Diagnostic Lab, Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, Saudi Arabia; Serum and Vaccine Research Institute, Abbassia, Egypt. 4. Al Ahsa Veterinary Diagnostic Lab, Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, Saudi Arabia. 5. Department of Animal Resources, Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
Aim: The present study was designed for the detection of the most prevalent respiratory infections in chicken flocks and clarifying their interaction and impact on flock health.
Materials and Methods: A total of 359 serum samples were collected from 55 backyard chickens and tested using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits to determine the seroprevalence of Newcastle disease virus (NDV), infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), influenza type A, Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG), and Mycoplasma synoviae (MS). Molecular prevalence of NDV, IBV, low pathogenic avian influenza virus (LPAIV) H9N2, MG, and MS was carried out on swab, and tissue samples collected from 55 backyard flocks and 11 commercial broiler flocks suffered from respiratory infections using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcription-PCR.
Results: Seroprevalence of NDV, IBV, Influenza type A virus, MG, and MS in chicken backyard flocks was 56.4%, 50.9%, 12.7%, 14.5%, and 3.6%, respectively. Specific antibodies against one or more respiratory viruses and mycoplasma were detected in 36.4% of backyard flocks, indicating concurrent viral infections. The molecular survey showed that 90.9% of chicken backyard flocks were infected with common respiratory viruses (NDV, IBV, and LPAIV H9N2) while 81.8% of commercial broiler flocks were infected. The molecular prevalence rate of NDV, IBV, and LPAIV H9N2 was 46.97%, 56.1%, and 19.7% in backyard flocks, respectively. Combined viral and bacterial infection represented 40% and 63.6% of the respiratory infections, resulting in enhanced pathogenicity and increased mortalities of up to 87.5% and 27.8% in backyard and commercial flocks, respectively. Mixed infection of IBV, LPAIV H9N2, and/or Escherichia coli is the most prevalent mixed infection in broiler flocks, inducing severe clinical outcomes. Avian pathogenic E. coli was, respectively, isolated from 40% of backyard flocks and 81.82% of broiler flocks. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from three backyard chicken flocks mixed with other respiratory pathogens with elevated mortality. Mixed infection of E. coli and MG reported in 9.1% of broiler flock. MG was detected in 14.5% of backyard flocks and 9.1% of broiler flocks while MS was detected only in 3.6% of backyard chickens mixed with E. coli, and other viruses.
Conclusion: Our results confirm that mixed infections are more commonly prevalent and associated with dramatic exacerbation in clinical outcomes than a single infection. Bidirectional synergistic interaction between these concurrently interacted respiratory pathogens explains the severe clinical impact and high mortality rate. The high prevalence of IBV (either as a single or combined infection) with LPAIV H9N2 and/or E. coli, in spite of intensive use of commercial vaccines, increases the need for revising vaccination programs and the application of standard biosecurity measures. Backyard chickens impose a great risk and threaten commercial flocks due to the high prevalence of viral respiratory pathogens.
Publisher
Veterinary World
Subject
General Veterinary
Reference64 articles.
1. Yashpal, S.M., Devi, P.P. and Sagar, M.G. (2004) Detection of three avian respiratory viruses by single-tube multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest., 16(3): 244-248. 2. Roussan, D.A., Haddad, R. and Khawaldeh, G. (2008) Molecular survey of avian respiratory pathogens in commercial broiler chicken flocks with respiratory diseases in Jordan. Poult. Sci., 87(3): 444-448. 3. Haghighat-Jahromi, M.K., Asasi, H., Nili, H., Dadras, H. and Shooshtari, A.H. (2008) Coinfection of avian influenza virus (H9N2 subtype) with infectious bronchitis live vaccine. Arch. Virol., 153(4): 651-655. 4. Cattoli, G., Susta, L., Terregino, C. and Brown C. (2011) Newcastle disease: A review of field recognition and current methods of laboratory detection. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest., 23(4): 637-656. 5. Miller, P.J., Koch, G. and Suarez, D. (2013) Newcastle disease, other avian paramyxoviruses, and Avian metapneumovirus infections. In: Swayne, D.E., Glisson, J.R., McDougald, L.R., Nolan, L.K., Suarez, D.L. and Nair, V., editors. Diseases of Poultry. 13th ed. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA. p250-377.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|