Intranasal dexmedetomidine with morphine or tramadol: A comparative study of effects on alfaxalone requirements for anesthesia in cats
-
Published:2023-06
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1201-1208
-
ISSN:2231-0916
-
Container-title:Veterinary World
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vet World
Author:
Hommuang Kewvaree1ORCID, Koatsang Nattika2ORCID, Srikullabutr Suttiporn3ORCID, Sattasathuchana Panpicha4ORCID, Thengchaisri Naris4ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Phutthamonthon District, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand. 2. Surgery Unit, Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand. 3. Department of Companion Animal Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand. 4. Department of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Intranasal (IN) sedatives provide a non-invasive route for premedication drug administration. This study compared the cardiorespiratory and sparing effects of IN dexmedetomidine combined with morphine (DM) or tramadol (DT) on alfaxalone requirements for anesthesia induction in cats.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-four cats were randomly assigned to three groups: Dexmedetomidine combined morphine (IN dexmedetomidine 20 µg/kg plus 0.2 mg/kg morphine), DT (IN dexmedetomidine 20 µg/kg plus 1 mg/kg tramadol), or control (no premedication). The intravenous dose of 1% alfaxalone for endotracheal intubation was recorded with sedation scores, cardiorespiratory parameters (heart rate and respiration rate), and side effects.
Results: Both DM and DT were associated with significantly higher sedation scores than baseline, and sedation scores were found to be highest 20 min after premedication. Sedation scores were comparable between DM and DT groups. Side effects, including hypersalivation, vomiting, and pupillary dilation, were observed in the DM and DT groups. The dosage of alfaxalone required in the DM group (1.5 ± 0.3 mg/kg) was comparable to that of the DT group (2.0 ± 0.6 mg/kg, p = 0.0861), and both groups required significantly less alfaxalone than the control group (3.0 ± 0.6 mg/kg; p < 0.01). Heart and respiratory rates were comparable between the DM and DT groups. Duration of anesthesia in the control group (11 ± 4 min) was significantly shorter than in the DM (29 ± 5 min, p = 0.0016) and DT (38 ± 14 min, p < 0.001) groups.
Conclusion: Intranasal administration of DM or DT produces good sedation and offers an alternative, non-invasive route for cats undergoing general anesthesia.
Keywords: alfaxalone, dexmedetomidine, intranasal, morphine, tramadol.
Funder
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University
Publisher
Veterinary World
Subject
General Veterinary
Reference35 articles.
1. Yuen, V.M., Irwin, M.G., Hui, T.W., Yuan, M. and Lee, L.H.Y. (2007) A double-blind, crossover assessment of the sedative and analgesic effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine. Anesth. Analg., 105(2): 374–380. 2. Iirola, T., Vilo, S., Manner, T., Aantaa, R., Lahtinen, M., Scheinin, M. and Olkkola, K.T. (2011) Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after intranasal administration. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 67(8): 825–831. 3. Canpolat, I., Karabulut, E. and Cakir, S. (2016) The efficacy of intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine, ketamine and morphine combination to young dogs. Int. J. Curr. Res., 8(8): 36090–36092. 4. Santangelo, R., Harel, M., Fourel, I., Micieli, F., Cataldi, M., Segard-Weisse, E. and Portier, K. (2019) Intranasal dexmedetomidine in healthy beagles: An echocardiographic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study. Vet. J., 251(7): 105346. 5. Margani, M., Akbarinejad, V. and Bagheri, M. (2015) Comparison of intranasal and intramuscular ketamine-midazolam combination in cats. Vet. Anaesth. Analg., 42(2): 178–181.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|