Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in small ruminant flocks in Karnataka in the Southern Province of India
-
Published:2021-11-09
Issue:
Volume:
Page:2855-2862
-
ISSN:2231-0916
-
Container-title:Veterinary World
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vet World
Author:
Natesan Krithiga1ORCID, Kalleshamurthy Triveni1ORCID, Nookala Mangadevi1ORCID, Yadav Chaitra1, Mohandoss Nagalingam1ORCID, Skariah Somy1ORCID, Sahay Swati1, Shome Bibek Ranjan1ORCID, Kumar Obli Rajendran Vinodh2ORCID, Rahman Habibur3, Shome Rajeswari1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Bacteriology, Indian Council for Agricultural Research-National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Division of Epidemiology, Indian Council for Agricultural Research-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. International Livestock Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease of high economic and public health importance in large and small ruminant populations worldwide. A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in small ruminants in organized farms in the southern region of India.
Materials and Methods: Farms exclusively rearing sheep and goats were selected based on the number of animals (small, medium, or large) and the location of the farm (urban, periurban, or rural). A total of 1499 serum samples; 1001 from sheeps and 498 from goats were sourced from six sheep and four goat farms and tested using Rose Bengal Plate and indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay tests.
Results: The apparent prevalence of brucellosis was higher in sheep (8.29%, 95% CI 6.7-10.1) than goats (5.82%, 95% CI 4.0-8.2). The true adjusted population level seroprevalence was also higher in sheep, at 7.7% (95% CI 6.0-9.6) than in goats, at 5.1% (95% CI 3.2-7.6). According to bivariate categorical analysis, six highly significant (p<0.001) animal- and farm-level risk factors for sheep were age, breed, number of lambings, history of abortion, rural farms, and presence of dogs on the farm. In goats, five significant risk factors were found: History of abortion, separate sheds, dogs on the farm, weekly veterinary consultation, and lack of brucellosis awareness. In a logistic regression model, abortion (OR adjusted 10.8, 95% CI 1.2-96.12), rural farms (OR adjusted 8.5, 95% CI 3.6-20.0), and absence of separate sheds on the farms (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1- 3.5) were found to be significant risk factors for ovine brucellosis.
Conclusion: The use of complementary measures to tackle the multiple animal- and farm-level risk factors may help to reduce the disease burden in the absence of a vaccination policy for small ruminants in India.
Funder
Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Publisher
Veterinary World
Subject
General Veterinary
Reference43 articles.
1. Memish, Z.A. and Balkhy, H.H. (2004) Brucellosis and international travel. J. Travel Med., 11(1): 49-55. 2. OIE. (2012) Bovine brucellosis, Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. World Organization for Animal Health, OIE, Paris, France. p1304. 3. Garin-Bastuji, B. (2011) In: Roginski, H., Fuquay, J.W. and Fox, P.F., editors. Brucella spp. Encyclopaedia of Dairy Sciences. London, Academic Press. p31-39. 4. Negash, E., Shimelis, S. and Beyene, D. (2012) Seroprevalence of small ruminant brucellosis and its public health awareness in selected sites of Dire Dawa region, Eastern Ethiopia. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health, 4(4): 61-66. 5. Radostits, O.M., Gay, C., Blood, C.D. and Hinchclift, W.K. (2007) Veterinary Medicine, Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses. 10th ed. ELBS Bailliere Tindall, London, UK. p963-994.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|