Affiliation:
1. Volga District Medical Center under the Federal Medical and Biological Agency
2. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Abstract
Objective: to determine the relationship between adherence to treatment in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and corneal graft survival over a 12-month follow-up period. Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of 56 patients who underwent "high risk" PKP was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their compliance. The full compliance group included those with more than 90% of visits within the first year after the intervention; the poor compliance group included those with more than 10% of missed visits. Results. The high adherence group was characterised by a higher proportion of women (p=0.033), a mean 7 years younger age of the patients (p=0.021) and a predominance of higher education (p=0.014). One year after PKP, patients with complete compliance (74%) were more likely to have a favourable outcome than those with incomplete compliance (48%) (p=0.046). The calculation of the odds ratio (OR 3.52; Cl: 1.1362-10.88; p=0.045) indicated a statistically significant role of treatment adherence as a factor in keratoplasty efficacy. The high compliance group had a visual acuity gain of 2 lines at 12 months (p=0.003). Conclusion. Compliance after corneal transplantation has a significant impact on graft survival and clinical outcome. The development and implementation of a set of measures to increase adherence could significantly improve the safety and efficacy of this high-tech treatment for patients with disabling corneal pathology.
Publisher
LLC Science and Innovations
Reference20 articles.
1. Flaxman SR, Bourne RA, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2017; 5 (12): e1221-34. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X (17) 30393-5
2. Mathews PM, Lindsley K, Aldave AJ, Akpek EK. Etiology of global corneal blindness and current practices of corneal transplantation: A focused review. Cornea. 2018; 37 (9): 1198-203. DOI: 10.1097/ICO. 0000000000001666
3. Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, et al. Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2016; 134(2): 167-73. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol. 2015.4776
4. Dinh THA, Kalinnikov YuYu, Tikhonovich MV, et al. The development of technologies in endothelial keratoplasty (review). Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2022; 18 (1): 12— 8.
5. Arzhimatova GS, Salikhov ЕА, Shemyakin MYu, Ibraimov Al. Retrospective analysis of the results and causes of penetrating keratoplasty with native donor material in a multidisciplinary hospital (Along the example of MCOC Bot-kin Hospital). Ophthalmology in Russia. 2022; 19 (4): 931-8. DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2022-4-931-938