Affiliation:
1. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2. Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
Abstract
Background — Although wearing masks is inevitable these days, the effects of wearing them on physiologic parameters have not been reported. This study aimed to assess the effects of wearing no mask, a three-layer standard surgical mask, and wearing an N95 mask on blood oxygen saturation, aerobic tolerance, and performance during exercise. Methods — Twenty-one participants were enrolled in the study. Each participant was monitored with electrocardiography (ECG) while performing an exercise tolerance test using the Bruce treadmill protocol. Testing was conducted three times on different dates. Participants did not use any mask in the first test but did wear surgical and N95 masks during the second and third tests respectively. Respiratory rate (RR) was assessed for 10 seconds and then multiplied by 6. Heart rate (HR) was monitored by ECG, and oxygen saturation levels were monitored (O2Sat) via digital pulse-oximetry. Assessments were done before warm-up, at the middle and end of each Bruce stage, and as well at 1, 2, and 5 minutes into recovery (masks were worn during recovery). Results — HR, RR, and O2Sat measured data were all significantly different between the three trials at end-stage 3 of Bruce treadmill protocol (p<0.05). Although HR was still higher through the recovery period in the N95 trial in comparison with other trials (p<0.05), RR and O2Sat measured data were not different in the recovery phase. Conclusion — HR, RR, O2Sat and exercise tolerance are significantly affected by wearing surgical and N95 masks.
Funder
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Publisher
LLC Science and Innovations
Reference10 articles.
1. Faghy MA, Arena R, Stoner L, Haraf RH, Josephson R, Hills AP, et al., The need for exercise sciences and an integrated response to COVID-19: A position statement from the international HL-PIVOT network. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2021; 67: 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2021.01.004.
2. Wackerhage H, Everett R, Krüger K, Murgia M, Simon P, Gehlert S, et al., Sport, exercise and COVID-19, the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. Dtsch Z Sportmed 2020; 71(5): e1-e12. https://doi.org/10.5960/dzsm.2020.441.
3. Roberge RJ, Kim JH, Benson SM. Absence of consequential changes in physiological, thermal and subjective responses from wearing a surgical mask. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2012; 181(1): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2012.01.010.
4. Bansal S, Chowdary KH, Reddy KS, Simha BV, Jha S, Ahmed KS. Effectiveness of N95 Respirator versus Surgical Mask against Sars-Cov2-Systemic Review and Meta Analysis. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology 2021; 25(2):213-225. https://www.annalsofrscb.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/927.
5. Abboah-Offei M, Salifu Y, Adewale B, Bayuo J, Ofosu-Poku R, Opare-Lokko EBA. A rapid review of the use of face mask in preventing the spread of COVID-19. Int J Nurs Stud Adv 2021; 3: 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2020.100013.