Friendship and Gender in Cultural-Psychological Perspective: Implications for Research, Practice, and Consultation

Author:

Adams Glenn1,Kurtiş Tuğçe2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Kansas

2. Department of Psychology, University of West Georgia

Abstract

Previous research documented differences in friendship such that people in various North American settings reported more friends, emphasized emotional support, and de-emphasized instrumental support relative to people in various West African settings. We used an experimental manipulation to test the hypothesis that these patterns reflect affordances for abstracted independence and embedded interdependence. Participants from universities in Ghana ( n = 67; 53% women) and the U.S.A. ( n = 71; 47% women) completed individual (“I am . . .”) or collective (“We are . . .”) versions of the Twenty Statements Test. They then completed measures of friendship experience. Results replicated cross-national differences and provided some evidence for hypothesized effects of the manipulation. Participants in the abstracted-independence condition reported “more friends than others” and (in the Ghanaian setting) emphasized emotional support over instrumental support to a greater extent than did participants in the embedded-interdependence condition. Discussion focuses on implications of international perspectives in psychology for research, practice, and consultation about relational belonging.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference61 articles.

1. The Cultural Grounding of Personal Relationship: Enemyship in North American and West African Worlds.

2. Decolonizing methods

3. The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Friendship in North American and West African worlds

4. Adams, G. Kurtiş, T., Salter, P. S. & Anderson, S. L. (2012). A cultural psychology of relationship: Decolonizing science and practice. In O. Gillath, G. Adams, & A. D. Kunkel, (Eds.), Relationship science: Integrating evolutionary, neuroscience, and sociocultural approaches (pp. 49–70). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

5. Aguilar, M. I. (1999). Localized kin and globalized friends: Religious modernity and the “educated self” in East Africa. In S. Bell & S. Coleman (Eds.), The anthropology of friendship (pp. 169–184). New York, NY: Berg.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3