Psychological science’s replicability crisis and what it means for science in the courtroom.-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Psychological science’s replicability crisis and what it means for science in the courtroom.

Published:2014 Issue:3 Volume:20 Page:225-238
ISSN:1939-1528
Container-title:Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
language:en
Short-container-title:Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Author:

Chin Jason M.

Publisher

American Psychological Association (APA)

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Editorial to special issue on direct replications in legal and criminological psychology;Legal and Criminological Psychology;2024-07-16

2. What limitations are reported in short articles in social and personality psychology?;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology;2023-10

3. Theorising Evidence Law;Oxford Journal of Legal Studies;2023-04-24

4. How to keep unreproducible neuroimaging evidence out of court: A case study in fMRI and psychopathy.;Psychology, Public Policy, and Law;2023-02

5. Neurolaw: Challenges and limits;Brain and Crime;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP