Development beyond 2030: more collaboration, less competition?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Development beyond 2030: more collaboration, less competition?

Published:2024-04-02 Issue:2 Volume:46 Page:227-242
ISSN:1474-6743
Container-title:International Development Planning Review
language:en
Short-container-title:International Development Planning Review

Author:

Kumar Ankit¹,Butcher Stephanie²,Hammett Daniel³,Barragan-Contreras Sandra⁴,Burns Vanessa⁵,Chesworth Ollie⁶,Cooper Gregory⁷,Kanai Juan Miguel⁸,Mottram Hannah⁹,Poveda Sammia¹⁰,Richardson Pamela¹¹

Affiliation:

1. Ankit Kumar is Lecturer at the University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Winter Street, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK;

2. Stephanie Butcher is Lecturer at the University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Winter Street, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK;

3. Daniel Hammett is Senior Lecturer at the University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Winter Street, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK;

4. Sandra Barragan-Contreras is Research Fellow at the University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Winter Street, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK;

5. Vanessa Burns is Leverhulme Fellow at the University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Winter Street, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK;

6. Ollie Chesworth is a PhD researcher at the University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Winter Street, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK;

7. Gregory Cooper is Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Winter Street, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK;

8. Juan Miguel Kanai is Senior Lecturer at the University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Winter Street, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK;

9. Hannah Mottram is Research Fellow at the University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Winter Street, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK;

10. Sammia Poveda is Lecturer at the University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Winter Street, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK;

11. Pamela Richardson is Marie Sklodowska-Curie Research Fellow at the University of Sheffield, Department of Geography, Winter Street, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK;

Abstract

This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represented a key landmark in collaboration and shared agenda-setting to address global challenges across scales and geographies. However, despite initial optimism that measurable goals would support accountability and transparency in development, progress towards realising goals has been mixed. Global development agendas increasingly face challenges from the intensification of climate change, the return of populism and ethnonationalism, and a deepening of inequalities at intra- and inter-national scales. This article interrogates the priorities that must inform a critical post-SDG development agenda. To think towards this, we first explore three questions of the development agenda: 1) can development be sustainable? 2) Can development be delivered through markets? And 3) can development be ‘global’? To address these tensions and take a first step towards a more critical post-2030 agenda, we call for a focus on spatialities, multiplicities and historicities of development.

Publisher

Liverpool University Press

Reference75 articles.

1. State Capitalism and the New Global D/development Regime

2. Gender Blindness and the Annulment of the Development Contract

3. Dams, political framing and sustainability as an empty signifier: The case of Belo Monte

4. Convergence Is Not Equality

5. Procedural injustices in large-scale solar energy: a case study in the Mayan region of Yucatan, Mexico