Invincible racism? The misuse of genetically informed arguments against Roma in Central and Eastern Europe

Author:

SHMIDT VICTORIA1,DONOHUE CHRISTOPHER R.2

Affiliation:

1. Victoria Shmidt is Senior Post-Doc and the leader of the project Critical History of Genetics in Central Eastern Europe] at Zentrum für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14, 8010, Graz, Austria.

2. Christopher R. Donohue is a historian at the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). BG 31 RM 4B0931 Center Dr Bethesda MD 20892.

Abstract

In this article, we challenge the idea that the development and the dissemination of scientific knowledge about Roma can be understood as “Eastern” or “Western.” Instead, we argue that the classical division between “science” and “pseudoscience” has the potential to fuel scientific racism and political and social exclusion across the globe. We narrate, for the first time, the role of sociobiology in the development of Roma “race science,” highlighting the ways in which its networks are developed and maintained. These specific mechanisms underlying the production of knowledge and its social and ideological effects may have further applications, such as the spread of mis- and dis-information. Our intent is to examine the attempts to deconstruct sociobiology and its application to Roma, by focusing on the effect of selective awareness among critics of sociobiology, which inevitably leads to the use of epistemic filters and heightens the risk of producing epistemic injustice. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 .

Publisher

Liverpool University Press

Reference70 articles.

1. Rushton's racial comparisons: An ecological critique of theory and method.

2. The IQ of Gypsies in Central Europe

3. Barzun, Jacques. 1965. Race: A study in superstition. New York: Harper & Row.

4. Female-biased reproductive strategies in a Hungarian Gypsy population

5. Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. London: Routledge.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3