Ecosystem-based maritime spatial planning in practice? On the limitations of a legalistic planning tradition

Author:

Walsh Cormac1,Clouting Hendrike2,Kühl-Stenzel Aline3,Schwemmer Henriette4

Affiliation:

1. Cormac Walsh is Researcher at the Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, School of Computing Science, Business Administration, Economics and Law – Ecological Economics, Ammerländer Heerstr. 114–18 Oldenburg, Oldenburg 26129, Germany;

2. Hendrike Clouting is Regional Planner at District of Lüneburg, Regional and Land Use Planning, Lüneburg, Niedersachsen 21335, Germany;

3. Aline Kühl-Stenzel is Marine Policy Officer at Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V., NABU Federal Office c/o NABU Hamburg, Klaus-Groth-Strasse 21, 20535 Hamburg, Germany;

4. Henriette Schwemmer is Researcher at the Federation of German Avifaunists (DDA), Büsum, Dachverband Deutscher Avifaunisten, An den Speichern 2, Münster 48157, Germany; email: (corresponding author) .

Abstract

The implementation of an ecosystem-based approach (EBA) is a core requirement of the EU Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) directive. Ecosystem-based management presents a fundamental challenge to established practices concerning the planning of marine space and the governance of human activities at sea. Experience to date indicates considerable variation in the application of EBA across Europe. This variation can be attributed in part to differences in underlying planning traditions and cultures. In this article, we examine the specific case of EBA implementation in the current maritime spatial plan for Germany’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Following an interpretive analysis approach, we critically analyse how the scope and function of planning are understood in German MSP policy and practice. A narrow understanding of planning as solely concerned with the spatial coordination of competing claims on marine space is traced to a legalistic terrestrial planning tradition with a long history in German public administration. This narrow interpretation of the role of planning is found to fundamentally restrict the strategic, performative capacity of German MSP and, in particular, the potential for German MSP to apply ecosystem-based management principles. In conclusion, we contend that the implementation of an EBA requires a fundamental shift in planning paradigms and modes of governance. This empirical case provides a basis for critical reflection on the capacity of EU member states to implement an EBA as understood under the MSP directive and the mode of planning this might entail.

Publisher

Liverpool University Press

Reference54 articles.

1. More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead?

2. An approach to ecosystem-based management in maritime spatial planning process

3. BFN (BUNDESAMT FÜR NATURSCHUTZ) (2020) ‘Naturschutzfachlicher Planungsbeitrag des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz zur Fortschreibung der Raumordnungspläne für die deutsche Ausschließliche Wirtschaftszone in der Nord- und Ostsee’ (Report) August Bonn Bundesamt für Naturschutz.

4. BFN (BUNDESAMT FÜR NATURSCHUTZ) (2021) Stellungnahme des BfN zu Änderungen im vorgelegten 2. Planentwurf des BSH vom 03.06.2021 Bonn Bundesamt für Naturschutz.

5. BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2022a) ‘Are EU member state’s maritime spatial plans fit for nature and climate? Technical report: approach and main findings’ Birdlife International https://www.birdlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Birdlife-Maritime-Spatial-Plan-Technical-report_web.pdf (accessed 15 January 2024).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3