From Freak Shows to Freaknature

Author:

Schmidt Jenne1

Affiliation:

1. Colorado State University

Abstract

Within environmental discourses, more-than-human beings with corporeal differences are often represented and exhibited as unnatural, abnormal, monstrous, freakish, bizarre, and deformed—as freaknature—and ultimately used as evidence of the harms of human-caused environmental contamination. The article examines the construction of freaknature alongside histories of the nineteenth- and twentieth-century American freak show to consider how these contemporary portrayals of the more-than-human not only reinvigorate the ableist tropes that were central to the freak show, but also reinforce logics of gender essentialism, transphobia, white supremacy, Orientalism, and racial purity. Both freak shows and freaknature operate/d as a scientific apparatus constructing and exhibiting some human and more-than-human beings as unnatural while shoring up other corporeal formations as normal/natural. Together, these crip figures on display call into question the binaries at the foundation of Western science.

Publisher

Liverpool University Press

Subject

General Social Sciences,General Health Professions,Health (social science)

Reference48 articles.

1. Adams, Rachel. Sideshow U.S.A.: Freaks and the American Cultural Imagination. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2001. Print.

2. Mystery Still Surrounds Deformed Mountain Lion.;Ashby David;Idaho State Journal,2017

3. Hermaphrodite Frogs Found in Suburban Ponds.;Barringer Felicity;The New York Times,2008

4. Bogdan, Robert. Freak Show: Presenting Human Oddities for Amusement and Profit. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988. Print.

5. Bogdan, Robert. “The Social Construction of Freaks.” Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body. Ed. Rosemarie Garland Thomson. New York: NYU Press, 1996. 23–37. Print.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Rethinking the Species Divide;Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies;2023-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3