Affiliation:
1. Department of General Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Guannan County
2. Department of General Surgery, The First People’s Hospital of Lin ping District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Abstract
Purpose:
In patients with gallstones complicated by common bile duct (CBD) stones, both normal and dilated common bile ducts have been reported. The goal of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of primary suturing after microincision of the cystic duct confluence in treating these patients.
Method:
Between July 2018 and December 2021, 104 patients were admitted to the Department of General Surgery at Guannan County People’s Hospital with gallstone complications, and their records were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups: normal CBD group (n=70, CBD diameter: 6.0 to 8.0 mm) and dilated CBD group (n=34, CBD diameter: >8.0 mm). In these 104 patients, there were 75 cases of CBD stones with acute cholangitis, 12 cases of CBD stones without cholangitis, and 17 cases of mild biliary pancreatitis with CBD stones (including 2 cases of biliary pancreatitis with cholangitis). Among all patients, there were 37 cases with jaundice, 67 cases without jaundice, and 5 cases of emergency surgery. All patients underwent microincision of the cystic duct confluence followed by primary suturing. Both groups were compared on a variety of general and perioperative indicators.
Result:
All patients underwent laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy; there were no cases of biliary tract injury or conversion to laparotomy. There was no statistically significant difference in operation duration (P=0.286), blood loss (P=0.06), length of stay (P=0.821), and time to drainage tube removal (P=0.096) between the 2 groups.
Conclusion:
Microincision of the cystic duct confluence, followed by a primary suture, is a safe and effective treatment for CBD stones in patients with a normal CBD diameter, as determined by preoperative imaging.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference19 articles.
1. Big-data analysis: a clinical pathway on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones;Zhang;World J Gastroenterol,2019
2. A randomized controlled trial of emergency LCBDE + LC and ERCP + LC in the treatment of choledocholithiasis with acute cholangitis;Zou;Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne,2022
3. Outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus primary LCBDE for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis;Kim;J Int Med Res,2020
4. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis;Hong;Surg Endosc,2006
5. Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials;Lan;Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2023