Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Combined With Portal-Superior Mesenteric Vein Resection and Reconstruction: Inferior-Posterior “Superior Mesenteric Artery-First” Approach

Author:

An Baiqiang1,Yue Qing2,Wang Shupeng1,Han Wei1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center

2. Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with portal-superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection and reconstruction is increasingly performed. We aimed to introduce a safe and effective surgical approach and share our clinical experience with LPD with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction. Methods: We reviewed data for the patients undergoing LPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction at the First Hospital of Jilin University between April 2021 and May 2023. The inferior-posterior “superior mesenteric artery-first” approach was used. We compared the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinicopathological data of the 2 groups to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LPD with major vascular resection. Results: A cohort of 37 patients with periampullary and pancreatic tumors underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with major vascular resection and reconstruction, consisting of 21 LPDs and 16 OPDs. The LPD group had a longer operation time (322 vs. 235 min, P=0.039), reduced intraoperative bleeding (152 vs. 325 mL, P=0.026), and lower intraoperative blood transfusion rates (19.0% vs. 50.0%, P=0.046) compared with the OPD group. The LPD group had significantly shorter operation times in end-to-end anastomosis (26 vs. 15 min, P=0.001) and artificial grafts vascular reconstruction (44 vs. 22 min, P=0.000) compared with the OPD group. There was no significant difference in the rate of R0 resection (100% vs. 87.5%, P=0.096). The length of hospital stay and ICU stay did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (15 vs. 18 d, P=0.636 and 2.5 vs. 4.5 d, P=0.726, respectively). However, the postoperative hospital stay in the LPD group was notably shorter compared with the OPD group (11 vs. 16 d, P=0.007). Postoperative complication rates, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) Grade A/B, biliary leakage, and delayed gastric emptying (DGE), were similar between the two groups (38.1% vs. 43.8%, P=0.729). In addition, 1 patient in each group developed thrombosis, with vascular patency improving after anticoagulation treatment. Conclusion: LPD combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction can be easily and safely performed using the inferior-posterior “superior mesenteric artery-first” approach in cases of venous invasion. Further studies are required to evaluate the procedure’s long-term outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3