Quality and Safety Practices Among Academic Obstetrics and Gynecology Departments

Author:

Christopher Diane1,Leininger William M.2,Beaty Laurel1,Nunziato Jaclyn D.3,Kremer Mallory E.4,Diaz Quinones Juan J.5,Rutz Sara4,Griffin Todd R.6,Klatt Timothy E.7

Affiliation:

1. University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO

2. Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Navy Medicine Research and Training Command, San Diego, CA

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

5. University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL

6. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY

7. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

Abstract

The objective was to quantify resources devoted to quality and patient safety initiatives, to document the development and use of key performance indicator reports regarding patient outcomes and patient feedback, and to assess the culture of safety within academic obstetrics and gynecology departments. Chairs of academic obstetrics and gynecology departments were asked to complete a quality and safety assessment survey. Surveys were distributed to 138 departments, yielding 52 completed responses (37.7%). Five percent of departments reported including a patient representative on a quality committee. Most committee leaders (60.5%) and members (67.4%) received no compensation. Formal training was required in 28.8% of responding departments. Most departments monitored key performance metrics for inpatient outcomes (95.9%). Leaders scored their departments’ culture of safety highly. Most departments provided no protected time to faculty devoted to quality efforts, generation of key performance indicators for inpatient activities was prevalent and integrating patient and community input remain unrealized opportunities.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. TeamSTEPPS improves patient safety;BMJ Open Quality;2024-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3