Watch-and-Wait strategy vs. resection in patients with radiologic complete response after conversion therapy for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma:a propensity score-matching comparative study

Author:

Li Binkui12,Wang Chenwei12,He Wei12,Qiu Jiliang12,Zheng Yun12,Zou Ruhai13,Lin Zhu12,Shi Yunxing12,Yuan Yichuan12,Zhang Rong14,Zhang Chao15,Chen Minshan12,Lau Wan Yee6,Yuan Yunfei12

Affiliation:

1. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China

2. Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

3. Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

4. Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

5. Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

6. Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China

Abstract

Background: The optimal subsequent management for patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) who have achieved complete response (CR) following conversion therapy remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of the watch-and-wait (W-W) strategy versus surgical resection (SR) for these patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study reviewed patients with initially uHCC who underwent conversion therapy employing transarterial therapies combined with or without systemic therapies. Radiologic CR (rCR), clinical CR (cCR), and pathologic CR (pCR) were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the W-W and SR groups. Results: Among 1880 patients with uHCC who underwent conversion therapy, 207 (11.0%) achieved rCR. Finally, we enrolled 149 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, including 74 receiving W-W strategy and 75 undergoing SR. Among the 149 patients with rCR, the W-W group demonstrated comparable 3-year OS rates to the SR group (80.9% vs 83.1%, P=0.77), but demonstrated inferior PFS rates (14.4% vs 46.5%, P=0.002). These results remained consistent after propensity score matching. For the 57 patients who achieved cCR, the W-W group exhibited comparable 3-year OS (88.1% vs 87.9%, P=0.89) and PFS rates (27.8% vs 40.8%, P=0.34) compared to SR group. Among the 75 patients in the SR group, 31 (41.3%) achieved pCR and 44 (58.7%) reached non-pCR. When compared with patients with pCR, those who achieved rCR in the W-W group showed comparable OS but inferior PFS rates. Moreover, patients who achieved rCR in the W-W group displayed both comparable OS and PFS rates to those with non-pCR. Conclusion: The W-W strategy offered comparable survival outcomes to surgical resection in patients with initially uHCC who achieved rCR or cCR after conversion therapy. For these patients, the W-W strategy could be offered as an alternative treatment option.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3