The Importance of Temporal Resolution for Ultra-High-Resolution Coronary Angiography

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the effect of temporal resolution on subjective and objective image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the ultra-high-resolution (UHR) mode with dual-source photon-counting detector (PCD) CT. Materials and Methods This retrospective, institutional review board–approved study evaluated 30 patients (9 women; mean age, 80 ± 10 years) undergoing UHR CCTA with a clinical dual-source PCD-CT scanner. Images were acquired with a tube voltage of 120 kV and using a collimation of 120 × 0.2 mm. Gantry rotation time was 0.25 seconds. Each scan was reconstructed using both single-source and dual-source data resulting in an image temporal resolution of 125 milliseconds and 66 milliseconds, respectively. The average heart rate and the heart rate variability were recorded. Images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.2 mm, quantum iterative reconstruction strength level 4, and using the Bv64 and Bv72 kernel for patients without and with coronary stents, respectively. For subjective image quality, 2 experienced readers rated motion artifacts and vessel delineation, or in-stent lumen visualization using 5-point discrete visual scales. For objective image quality, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, stent blooming artifacts, and vessel and stent sharpness were quantified. Results Fifteen patients had coronary stents, and 15 patients had no coronary stents. The mean heart rate and heart rate variability during data acquisition were 72 ± 10 beats per minute and 5 ± 6 beats per minute, respectively. Subjective image quality in the right coronary artery, left anterior descending, and circumflex artery was significantly superior in 66 milliseconds reconstructions compared with 125 milliseconds reconstructions for both readers (all P's < 0.01; interreader agreement, Krippendorff α = 0.84–1.00). Subjective image quality deteriorated significantly at higher heart rates for 125 milliseconds (ρ = 0.21, P < 0.05) but not for 66 milliseconds reconstructions (ρ = 0.11, P = 0.22). No association was found between heart rate variability and image quality for both 125 milliseconds (ρ = 0.09, P = 0.33) and 66 milliseconds reconstructions (ρ = 0.13, P = 0.17), respectively. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were similar between 66 milliseconds and 125 milliseconds reconstructions (both P's > 0.05), respectively. Stent blooming artifacts were significantly lower on 66 milliseconds than on 125 milliseconds reconstructions (46.7% ± 10% vs 52.9% ± 8.9%, P < 0.001). Higher sharpness was found in 66 milliseconds than in 125 milliseconds reconstructions both in native coronary arteries (left anterior descending artery: 1031 ± 265 ∆HU/mm vs 819 ± 253 ∆HU/mm, P < 0.01; right coronary artery: 884 ± 352 ∆HU/mm vs 654 ± 377 ∆HU/mm, P < 0.001) and stents (5318 ± 3874 ∆HU/mm vs 4267 ± 3521 ∆HU/mm, P < 0.001). Conclusions Coronary angiography with PCD-CT in the UHR mode profits considerably from a high temporal resolution, resulting in less motion artifacts, superior vessel delineation and in-stent lumen visualization, less stent blooming artifacts, and superior vessel and stent sharpness.