Photon Counting Detector CT-Based Virtual Noniodine Reconstruction Algorithm for In Vitro and In Vivo Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Impact of Virtual Monoenergetic and Quantum Iterative Reconstructions

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) and quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) on the accuracy of coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) using a virtual noniodine (VNI) reconstruction algorithm on a first-generation, clinical, photon counting detector computed tomography system. Materials and Methods Coronary artery calcium scoring was evaluated in an anthropomorphic chest phantom simulating 3 different patient sizes by using 2 extension rings (small: 300 × 200 mm, medium: 350 × 250 mm, large: 400 × 300 mm) and in patients (n = 61; final analyses only in patients with coronary calcifications [n = 34; 65.4 ± 10.0 years; 73.5% male]), who underwent nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced, electrocardiogram-gated, cardiac computed tomography on a photon counting detector system. Phantom and patient data were reconstructed using a VNI reconstruction algorithm at different VMI (55–80 keV) and QIR (strength 1–4) levels (CACSVNI). True noncontrast (TNC) scans at 70 keV and QIR “off” were used as reference for phantom and patient studies (CACSTNC). Results In vitro and in vivo CACSVNI showed strong correlation (r > 0.9, P < 0.001 for all) and excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9 for all) with CACSTNC at all investigated VMI and QIR levels. Phantom and patient CACSVNI significantly increased with decreasing keV levels (in vitro: from 475.2 ± 26.3 at 80 keV up to 652.5 ± 42.2 at 55 keV; in vivo: from 142.5 [7.4/737.7] at 80 keV up to 248.1 [31.2/1144] at 55 keV; P < 0.001 for all), resulting in an overestimation of CACSVNI at 55 keV compared with CACSTNC at 70 keV in some cases (in vitro: 625.8 ± 24.4; in vivo: 225.4 [35.1/959.7]). In vitro CACS increased with rising QIR at low keV. In vivo scores were significantly higher at QIR 1 compared with QIR 4 only at 60 and 80 keV (60 keV: 220.3 [29.6–1060] vs 219.5 [23.7/1048]; 80 keV: 152.0 [12.0/735.6] vs 142.5 [7.4/737.7]; P < 0.001). CACSVNI was closest to CACSTNC at 60 keV, QIR 2 (+0.1%) in the small; 55 keV, QIR 1 (±0%) in the medium; 55 keV, QIR 4 (−0.1%) in the large phantom; and at 60 keV, QIR 1 (−2.3%) in patients. Conclusions Virtual monoenergetic imaging reconstructions have a significant impact on CACSVNI. The effects of different QIR levels are less consistent and seem to depend on several individual conditions, which should be further investigated.