Automated Triage of Screening Breast MRI Examinations in High-Risk Women Using an Ensemble Deep Learning Model

Author:

Bhowmik Arka1,Monga Natasha1,Belen Kristin1,Varela Keitha1,Sevilimedu Varadan2,Thakur Sunitha B.,Martinez Danny F.1,Sutton Elizabeth J.1,Pinker Katja1,Eskreis-Winkler Sarah1

Affiliation:

1. Radiology

2. Epidemiology and Biostatistics

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the study is to develop and evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model to triage breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in high-risk patients without missing any cancers.Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective study, 16,535 consecutive contrast-enhanced MRIs performed in 8354 women from January 2013 to January 2019 were collected. From 3 New York imaging sites, 14,768 MRIs were used for the training and validation data set, and 80 randomly selected MRIs were used for a reader study test data set. From 3 New Jersey imaging sites, 1687 MRIs (1441 screening MRIs and 246 MRIs performed in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients) were used for an external validation data set. The DL model was trained to classify maximum intensity projection images as “extremely low suspicion” or “possibly suspicious.” Deep learning model evaluation (workload reduction, sensitivity, specificity) was performed on the external validation data set, using a histopathology reference standard. A reader study was performed to compare DL model performance to fellowship-trained breast imaging radiologists.ResultsIn the external validation data set, the DL model triaged 159/1441 of screening MRIs as “extremely low suspicion” without missing a single cancer, yielding a workload reduction of 11%, a specificity of 11.5%, and a sensitivity of 100%. The model correctly triaged 246/246 (100% sensitivity) of MRIs in recently diagnosed patients as “possibly suspicious.” In the reader study, 2 readers classified MRIs with a specificity of 93.62% and 91.49%, respectively, and missed 0 and 1 cancer, respectively. On the other hand, the DL model classified MRIs with a specificity of 19.15% and missed 0 cancers, highlighting its potential use not as an independent reader but as a triage tool.ConclusionsOur automated DL model triages a subset of screening breast MRIs as “extremely low suspicion” without misclassifying any cancer cases. This tool may be used to reduce workload in standalone mode, to shunt low suspicion cases to designated radiologists or to the end of the workday, or to serve as base model for other downstream AI tools.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Cancer Screening;J Am Coll Radiol,2017

2. Breast cancer screening in women at higher-than-average risk: recommendations from the ACR;J Am Coll Radiol,2018

3. Supplemental MRI screening for women with extremely dense breast tissue;N Engl J Med,2019

4. First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging;Breast Cancer Res Treat,2000

5. Breast MRI: state of the art;Radiology,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3