Photon-Counting Versus Energy-Integrating Detector CT Angiography of the Lower Extremity in a Human Cadaveric Model With Continuous Extracorporeal Perfusion

Abstract

Objectives Detailed visualization of the arterial runoff is mandatory for the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. This study aims to compare the performance of a first-generation photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) to a third-generation energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). Materials and Methods Computed tomography angiographies of 8 upper leg arterial runoffs were performed on human cadaveric models with continuous extracorporeal perfusion. For both PCD-CT and EID-CT, radiation dose-equivalent 120 kVp acquisition protocols (low-/medium-/high-dose: CTDIVol = 3/5/10 mGy) were used. All scans were performed with standard collimation (PCD-CT: 144 × 0.4 mm; EID-CT: 96 × 0.6 mm), a pitch factor of 0.4, and a gantry rotation time of 1.0 second. Reformatting of data included the use of comparable vascular kernels (Bv 48/49), a slice thickness and increment of 1.0 mm, and a field of view of 150 × 150 mm. Eight radiologists evaluated image quality independently using a browser-based pairwise forced-choice comparison setup. Kendall concordance coefficient (W) was calculated to estimate interrater agreement. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared based on 1-way analyses of variance and linear regression analysis. Results Low-dose PCD-CT achieved superior signal-to-noise ratio/CNR values compared with high-dose EID-CT (P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis suggested that an EID-CT scan with a CTDIVol of at least 15.5 mGy was required to match the CNR value of low-dose PCD-CT. Intraluminal contrast attenuation was higher in PCD-CT than EID-CT, irrespective of dose level (415.0 ± 31.9 HU vs 329.2 ± 29.4 HU; P < 0.001). Subjective image quality of low-dose PCD-CT was considered superior to high-dose EID-CT (P < 0.001). Interrater agreement was high (W = 0.989). Conclusions Using cadaveric models with continuous extracorporeal perfusion allows for intraindividual image quality comparisons between PCD-CT and EID-CT on variable dose levels. With superior luminal contrast attenuation and denoising in angiographies of the peripheral arterial runoff, PCD-CT displayed potential for radiation saving of up to 83% compared with EID-CT.