7 T Lumbosacral Plexus Neurography

Author:

Marth Adrian A.ORCID,Feuerriegel Georg Constantin,Wanivenhaus Florian,Nanz Daniel,Sutter Reto

Abstract

Objectives 7 T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can offer superior spatial resolution compared with lower field strengths. However, its use for imaging of the lumbosacral plexus has been constrained by technical challenges and therefore remained relatively unexplored. Therefore, this study investigated the feasibility of 7 T MR neurography by means of comparing the visibility of the spinal nerves and image quality to 3 T MR neurography. Materials and Methods In this monocentric, institutional review board–approved, prospective study, 30 healthy subjects underwent acquisition time–matched 7 T MR neurography and 3 T MR neurography of the lumbar spine using a 3-dimensional dual-echo steady-state sequence. Visibility of the nerve root, dorsal root ganglia, and spinal nerve fascicles of L1–S1, along with image artifacts and overall image quality, were compared between the different field strengths by 2 radiologists using 4-point Likert scales (1 = poor, 4 = excellent). Comparisons between field strengths were made using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and interobserver agreement was assessed. Results 7 T MR neurography enabled significantly improved visualization of the lumbar nerve roots, dorsal root ganglia, and spinal nerve fascicles (P ≤ 0.002). Compared with 3 T MR neurography, no difference in overall image quality was observed (P = 0.211), although 7 T MR imaging exhibited significantly increased image artifacts (P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement (κ) for qualitative measures ranged from 0.71 to 0.88 for 7 T, and from 0.75 to 0.91 for 3 T. Conclusions 7 T MR neurography allowed for improved visualization of lumbar spinal nerves, whereas overall image quality was comparable to 3 T MR neurography. This supports the feasibility of 7 T MR neurography of the lumbosacral plexus, even though image artifacts at 7 T were significantly increased.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3