Effects of Divided Attention and Operating Room Noise on Perception of Pulse Oximeter Pitch Changes

Author:

Stevenson Ryan A.1,Schlesinger Joseph J.2,Wallace Mark T.3

Affiliation:

1. Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Nashville, Tennessee, and Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.

2. Resident Physician, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee and BH Robbins Scholars Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

3. *Professor, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Nashville, Tennessee, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, and Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Anesthesiology requires performing visually oriented procedures while monitoring auditory information about a patient’s vital signs. A concern in operating room environments is the amount of competing information and the effects that divided attention has on patient monitoring, such as detecting auditory changes in arterial oxygen saturation via pulse oximetry. Methods: The authors measured the impact of visual attentional load and auditory background noise on the ability of anesthesia residents to monitor the pulse oximeter auditory display in a laboratory setting. Accuracies and response times were recorded reflecting anesthesiologists’ abilities to detect changes in oxygen saturation across three levels of visual attention in quiet and with noise. Results: Results show that visual attentional load substantially affects the ability to detect changes in oxygen saturation concentrations conveyed by auditory cues signaling 99 and 98% saturation. These effects are compounded by auditory noise, up to a 17% decline in performance. These deficits are seen in the ability to accurately detect a change in oxygen saturation and in speed of response. Conclusions: Most anesthesia accidents are initiated by small errors that cascade into serious events. Lack of monitor vigilance and inattention are two of the more commonly cited factors. Reducing such errors is thus a priority for improving patient safety. Specifically, efforts to reduce distractors and decrease background noise should be considered during induction and emergence, periods of especially high risk, when anesthesiologists has to attend to many tasks and are thus susceptible to error.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference24 articles.

1. Detrimental effects of noise on anaesthetists.;Can J Anaesth,1995

2. Noise in the operating rooms of Johns Hopkins Hospital.;J Acoust Soc Am,2007

3. Vigilance, boredom, and sleepiness.;J Clin Monit Comput,1999

4. Multiple measures of anesthesia workload during teaching and nonteaching cases.;Anesth Analg,2004

5. A measure of intraoperative attention to monitor displays.;Anesth Analg,1993

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3