Prevention of Intraoperative Awareness with Explicit Recall in an Unselected Surgical Population

Author:

Mashour George A.1,Shanks Amy2,Tremper Kevin K.3,Kheterpal Sachin4,Turner Christopher R.5,Ramachandran Satya Krishna4,Picton Paul4,Schueller Christa6,Morris Michelle7,Vandervest John C.8,Lin Nan9,Avidan Michael S.10

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor and Associate Chair for Faculty Affairs.

2. Research Specialist and Statistician.

3. Robert B. Sweet Professor and Chair.

4. Assistant Professor.

5. Chief of Anesthesia Service, Bay Area Medical Center, Marinette, Wisconsin.

6. Medical Student, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

7. Study Coordinator.

8. Programmer, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

9. Statistician.

10. Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Abstract

Background Intraoperative awareness with explicit recall occurs in approximately 0.15% of all surgical cases. Efficacy trials based on the Bispectral Index® (BIS) monitor (Covidien, Boulder, CO) and anesthetic concentrations have focused on high-risk patients, but there are no effectiveness data applicable to an unselected surgical population. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial of unselected surgical patients at three hospitals of a tertiary academic medical center. Surgical cases were randomized to alerting algorithms based on either BIS values or anesthetic concentrations. The primary outcome was the incidence of definite intraoperative awareness; prespecified secondary outcomes included postanesthetic recovery variables. Results The study was terminated because of futility. At interim analysis the incidence of definite awareness was 0.12% (11/9,376) (95% CI: 0.07-0.21%) in the anesthetic concentration group and 0.08% (8/9,460) (95% CI: 0.04-0.16%) in the BIS group (P = 0.48). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of meeting criteria for recovery room discharge or incidence of nausea and vomiting. By post hoc secondary analysis, the BIS protocol was associated with a 4.7-fold reduction in definite or possible awareness events compared with a cohort receiving no intervention (P = 0.001; 95% CI: 1.7-13.1). Conclusion This negative trial could not detect a difference in the incidence of definite awareness or recovery variables between monitoring protocols based on either BIS values or anesthetic concentration. By post hoc analysis, a protocol based on BIS monitoring reduced the incidence of definite or possible intraoperative awareness compared with routine care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference21 articles.

Cited by 215 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Depth of Anesthesia and Nociception Monitoring: Current State and Vision For 2050;Anesthesia & Analgesia;2024-01-12

2. Hormonal basis of sex differences in anesthetic sensitivity;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;2024-01-08

3. Consciousness and General Anesthesia: Challenges for Measuring the Depth of Anesthesia;Anesthesiology;2024-01-05

4. EEG-Messung in Narkose;AINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie;2023-12

5. Depth of anaesthesia monitoring: updated evidence. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2023; 131: 196–9;British Journal of Anaesthesia;2023-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3