Blood–Brain Barrier Transport Helps to Explain Discrepancies in In Vivo  Potency between Oxycodone and Morphine

Author:

Boström Emma1,Hammarlund-Udenaes Margareta2,Simonsson Ulrika S. H.3

Affiliation:

1. Project Scientist.

2. Professor.

3. Associate Professor.

Abstract

Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the brain pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relations of unbound oxycodone and morphine to investigate the influence of blood-brain barrier transport on differences in potency between these drugs. Methods Microdialysis was used to obtain unbound concentrations in brain and blood. The antinociceptive effect of each drug was assessed using the hot water tail-flick method. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was used to describe the blood-brain barrier transport of morphine as the rate (CLin) and extent (Kp,uu) of equilibration, where CLin is the influx clearance across the blood-brain barrier and Kp,uu is the ratio of the unbound concentration in brain to that in blood at steady state. Results The six-fold difference in Kp,uu between oxycodone and morphine implies that, for the same unbound concentration in blood, the concentrations of unbound oxycodone in brain will be six times higher than those of morphine. A joint pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of oxycodone and morphine based on unbound brain concentrations was developed and used as a statistical tool to evaluate differences in the pharmacodynamic parameters of the drugs. A power model using Effect = Baseline + Slope . C best described the data. Drug-specific slope and gamma parameters made the relative potency of the drugs concentration dependent. Conclusions For centrally acting drugs such as opioids, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relations describing the interaction with the receptor are better obtained by correlating the effects to concentrations of unbound drug in the tissue of interest rather than to blood concentrations.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference34 articles.

Cited by 95 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3