A Description of Intraoperative Ventilator Management in Patients with Acute Lung Injury and the Use of Lung Protective Ventilation Strategies

Author:

Blum James M.1,Maile Michael2,Park Pauline K.3,Morris Michelle4,Jewell Elizabeth5,Dechert Ronald6,Rosenberg Andrew L.7

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Lecturer, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

2. Anesthesiology Critical Care Fellow, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System.

3. Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System.

4. Senior Research Coordinator, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System.

5. Research Analyst, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System.

6. Administrative Manager—Healthcare, Department of Respiratory Therapy, University of Michigan Health System.

7. Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Internal Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System.

Abstract

Background The incidence of acute lung injury (ALI) in hypoxic patients undergoing surgery is currently unknown. Previous studies have identified lung protective ventilation strategies that are beneficial in the treatment of ALI. The authors sought to determine the incidence and examine the use of lung protective ventilation strategies in patients receiving anesthetics with a known history of ALI. Methods The ventilation parameters that were used in all patients were reviewed, with an average preoperative PaO₂/Fio₂ [corrected] ratio of ≤ 300 between January 1, 2005 and July 1, 2009. This dataset was then merged with a dataset of patients screened for ALI. The median tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, peak inspiratory pressures, fraction inhaled oxygen, oxygen saturation, and tidal volumes were compared between groups. Results A total of 1,286 patients met criteria for inclusion; 242 had a diagnosis of ALI preoperatively. Comparison of patients with ALI versus those without ALI found statistically yet clinically insignificant differences between the ventilation strategies between the groups in peak inspiratory pressures and positive end-expiratory pressure but no other category. The tidal volumes in cc/kg predicted body weight were approximately 8.7 in both groups. Peak inspiratory pressures were found to be 27.87 cm H₂O on average in the non-ALI group and 29.2 in the ALI group. Conclusion Similar ventilation strategies are used between patients with ALI and those without ALI. These findings suggest that anesthesiologists are not using lung protective ventilation strategies when ventilating patients with low PaO₂/Fio₂ [corrected] ratios and ALI, and instead are treating hypoxia and ALI with higher concentrations of oxygen and peak pressures.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference20 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3