Affiliation:
1. From the *Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY; †Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and ‡Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Abstract
Abstract
In the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer, the definitions for T (tumor), N (nodes), and M (metastases) remain substantially unchanged but with clarifications for certain categories that may have been problematic for pathologists and clinicians. The principal change is the decision to exclude lobular carcinoma in situ from T classification. In contrast, there is a major change in how stage is determined by introducing a new clinical prognostic stage and a new pathological prognostic stage. These prognostic stages incorporate information about grade, estrogen receptor expression, progesterone receptor expression, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression, and, in some cases, the Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score, in addition to T, N, and M, to create groups of cancers predicted to have a similar survival at 3 years based on information from the National Cancer Database. This review highlights the changes and notable clarifications to the TNM system and how these relate to standard pathology reporting.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献