Controversies in Gynecologic Cancer Staging: An AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition Perspective

Author:

Hagemann Ian S.1,Cole Lisa L.1,Cosin Jonathan A.1,Gress Donna M.1,Mutch David G.1,Olawaiye Alexander B.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Departments of *Pathology and Immunology and †Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; ‡Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School—Baystate, Springfield, MA; §Hartford Healthcare Cancer Institute, New Britain, CT; ∥American Joint Committee on Cancer, Chicago, IL; and ¶Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Abstract

Abstract Staging systems provide a common language to support clinical research and decision making in patients with cancer. The eighth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual incorporates updates that reflect evolving clinical practices and scientific insights. The present article summarizes changes that have been made for gynecologic subsites and outlines continued challenges. Gynecologic American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer staging continues to conform closely to current International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology staging. The eighth edition is aligned with the major revision made to International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology staging of ovarian cancer in 2014 and contains a unified staging system for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Continuing challenges for ovarian cancer include determining the relative significance of intraoperative rupture, surface involvement, and positive washings, which are rank ordered in the new staging system. Another challenge is assignment of a tubal versus ovarian primary site for high-grade serous carcinoma, which cannot be done in a reliable way. In uterine carcinoma, endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma is now recognized as a T1 cancer, and nodal micrometastases have been defined with their own N stage. Also, isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes have been incorporated in the staging of all gynecologic carcinomas. The staging of uterine sarcoma is largely unchanged. Future revisions may consider grouping these tumors with soft tissue sarcomas at large. Staging of cervical cancer is largely unchanged. Nomenclature of early invasive carcinoma and the challenges in defining tumor dimension in cervical carcinoma are discussed. The nodal staging of vulvar cancer now incorporates a vocabulary for isolated tumor cells and micrometastases. Despite the current interest in molecular staging, the eighth edition expert panel did not identify any specific biomarkers for inclusion in stage classification, but several are recommended for collection as ancillary data elements, including p16 status in vulvar, vaginal, and cervical tumors. In the eighth edition, as in the seventh, anatomic factors remain the cornerstone of gynecologic cancer staging.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3