Advances in Photoreceptor and Retinal pigment epithelium Quantifications in intermediate AMD: High-Res versus Standard SPECTRALIS OCT

Author:

Frank Sophie1,Reiter Gregor Sebastian1,Leingang Oliver1,Fuchs Philipp1,Coulibaly Leonard Mana1,Mares Virginia12,Bogunovic Hrvoje13,Schmidt-Erfurth Ursula1

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

2. Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

3. Christian Doppler Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Retina, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Purpose: In this study we investigated differences in retinal feature visualization of high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices with different axial resolutions in quantifications of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptors (PR) in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). Methods: Patients were imaged with standard SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT and the investigational High-Res OCT device (both by Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Drusen, RPE and PR layers were segmented using validated AI-based algorithms followed by manual corrections. Thickness- and drusen maps were computed for all patients. Loss and thickness measurements were compared between devices, drusen vs. non-drusen areas and EDTRS subfields using mixed-effects models. Results: Thirty-three eyes from 28 iAMD patients were included. Normalized PR integrity loss was significantly higher with 4.6% for standard OCT compared to 2.5% on High-Res OCT. The central and parafoveal PR integrity loss was larger than perifoveal loss (p<0.05). PR thickness was increased on High-Res OCT and in non-drusen regions (p<0.001). RPE appeared thicker on standard OCT and above drusen (p<0.01). Conclusion: Our study shows that High-Res OCT is able to identify the condition of investigated layers in iAMD with higher precision. This improved in vivo imaging technology might promote our understanding of the pathophysiology and progression of AMD.

Funder

Christian Doppler Forschungsgesellschaft

Bundesministerium für Digitalisierung und Wirtschaftsstandort

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3