Surgical drainage methods during pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Grad Justin R.1,Hatamnejad Amin1,Huan Peter W.1,Popovic Marko M.2,McKay Bryon R.3,Kertes Peter J.24,Muni Rajeev H.25

Affiliation:

1. Michael DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

2. Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

4. John and Liz Tory Eye Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

5. Department of Ophthalmology, St. Michael’s Hospital/Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Purpose: To assess efficacy and safety outcomes of subretinal fluid drainage methods during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: A systematic search strategy was conducted of studies published between January 2000 and October 2022. Included studies reported on either the safety or efficacy of two or more drainage methods during PPV for RRD patients. Results: Two randomized and five observational studies consisting of 1524 eyes were included. Best corrected visual acuity at last study observation and primary reattachment rate were similar across groups. A significantly lower risk of epiretinal membrane formation (ERM) was associated with draining subretinal fluid through pre-existing retinal breaks (PRB) (RR= 0.70, 95% CI=[0.60, 0.83], p=<0.01, I2=0%) or with perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) (RR=0.70, 95% CI=[0.59, 0.83], p=<0.01, I2=0%) compared to posterior retinotomy (PR). The risk of an abnormal foveal contour was significantly greater in PFCL-treated eyes relative to PR (RR=1.56, 95% CI=[1.13, 2.17], p=<0.01, I2=0%). Conclusions: No significant differences were observed in final BCVA at last study observation and primary reattachment rates across different drainage methods. There remains limited information on the topic and future research is warranted.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3