Safety Assessment and Pharmacokinetics of Intrathecal Methylprednisolone Acetate in Dogs

Author:

Rijsdijk Mienke1,van Wijck Albert J. M.2,Kalkman Cor J.3,Meulenhoff P. C. Willem4,Grafe Marjorie R.5,Steinauer Joanne6,Yaksh Tony L.7

Affiliation:

1. Resident Anesthesiology and Ph.D. Student, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

2. Staff Anesthesiologist and Head of the Pain Clinic, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, University Medical Center Utrecht.

3. Professor of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, University Medical Center Utrecht.

4. Staff Pharmacologist, Pharmacy Department, University Medical Center Utrecht.

5. Professor of Pathology, Pathology Department, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

6. Laboratory Manager and Director of Anesthesiology, Core Confocal Imaging Facility, Anesthesiology Department, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.

7. Professor in Anesthesiology and Pharmacology and Vice Chairman for Research in Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Department, University of California, San Diego.

Abstract

Background Intrathecal methylprednisolone acetate (MPA) has been used in patients with chronic pain syndromes. Its safety has been debated after reports of adverse events. No systematic preclinical evaluation of MPA has been reported. In the current study, the acute and long-term effects of intrathecal MPA on dog spinal tissue was studied with the injectate reformulated to include minimal adjuvants. Methods Seventeen dogs were implanted with intrathecal catheters and randomized to three groups: vehicle (lidocaine; 4 dogs), MPA 20 mg/ml (human dose; 7 dogs), and MPA 80 mg/ml (maximum deliverable dose; 6 dogs). In parallel with the human protocols, dogs received four injections at 7-day intervals. Clinical observations and plasma methylprednisolone measurements were done before and at intervals after intrathecal delivery. One week (acute) or 6 weeks (long-term) after the last injection, animals were sacrificed and spinal tissues harvested for histopathology. Results Other than a brief motor block, no adverse clinical event occurred in any animal. Group A (vehicle) showed minimal histologic changes (median histology-score; acute: 1.3, long-term: 1.0). Group B (MPA 20 mg/ml) had a diffuse inflammatory reaction (acute: 2.0, long-term: 3.0), group C (MPA 80 mg/ml) a severe inflammatory response, with large inflammatory masses (acute: 4.0, long-term: 7.0) The severity of the inflammatory reaction increased significantly with increasing dose at long-term sacrifice (acute P = 0.167, long-term P = 0.014). No neuronal injury, demyelination, or gliosis was seen in any animal. Conclusion These results, showing dose-dependent intrathecal inflammatory reactions at MPA doses and injectate concentrations comparable to those used in humans, indicate that the continued use of this modality in humans is not recommended.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference38 articles.

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3