Adverse Events with Medical Devices in Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit Patients Recorded in the French Safety Database in 2005–2006

Author:

Beydon Laurent1,Ledenmat Pierre Yves2,Soltner Christophe2,Lebreton Frédéric3,Hardin Vincent4,Benhamou Dan5,Clergue François6,Laguenie Gérard7

Affiliation:

1. Professor and Chair.

2. Staff Anesthesiologist.

3. Assistant Professor, Pôle d'Anesthésie Réanimation of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Université d'Angers.

4. Biomedical Engineer, Service Biomédical, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Université de Tours, Tours, France.

5. Professor and Chair, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation of Hôpital Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud 11, Paris, France.

6. Professor and Chair, Service d'Anesthésiologie of the Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.

7. Staff Anesthesiologist, Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation of the Groupe Hospitalier Cochin-Saint Vincent de Paul, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.

Abstract

Background French regulations require that adverse events involving medical devices be reported to the national healthcare safety agency. The authors evaluated reports made in 2005-2006 for patients in anesthesiology and critical care. Methods For each type of device, the authors recorded the severity and cause of the event and the manufacturer's response where relevant. The authors compared the results with those obtained previously from the reports (n = 1,004) sent in 1998 to the same database. Results The authors identified 4,188 events, of which 91% were minor, 7% severe, and 2% fatal. The cause was available for 1,935 events (46%). Faulty manufacturing was the main cause of minor events. Inappropriate use was the cause in a significantly larger proportion of severe events than minor events (P < 0.001) and was usually considered preventable via improved knowledge or device verification before use. Compared to with that in 1998, the annual number of reported events doubled and the rate of severe events decreased slightly (12-10%, P = 0.03). The rate of events related to manufacturing problems remained stable (59-60%, P = nonsignificant), and the rate of events caused by human errors was 32-42% (P = 0.01). There were no changes in the mortality rate (2% in both studies). Conclusions The number of adverse events related to medical devices indicates a need for greater attention to these complex pieces of equipment that can suffer from faulty design and manufacturing and from inappropriate use. Improvements in clinician knowledge of medical devices, and to a lesser extent improvement in manufacturing practices, should improve safety.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference45 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3