Latex Sensitization

Author:

Draisci Gaetano1,Zanfini Bruno A.1,Nucera Eleonora2,Catarci Stefano1,Sangregorio Raffaella3,Schiavino Domenico2,Mannocci Alice4,Patriarca Giampiero2

Affiliation:

1. Staff Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care.

2. Staff Allergologist, Department of Allergology.

3. Resident in Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

4. Staff Biostatistic, Unit of Hygiene, Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Roma, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

Background Previous studies have reported a greater frequency of sensitization to latex in the female population and a higher incidence of anaphylactic reactions to latex during cesarean section. In this study, the authors investigated the prevalence of latex sensitization in obstetric patients compared with nonpregnant subjects. Methods Two hundred ninety-four healthy pregnant women who were at term with a singleton fetus and scheduled for caesarean section (group A) were compared with 294 healthy nulliparous women with childbirth potential undergoing gynecologic surgery (group B). Before surgery, patients completed a questionnaire, and venous blood samples were collected to measure specific immunoglobulin E serum concentrations with a fluorescent enzyme immunoassay test. Skin-prick tests were performed if adverse reactions occurred during surgery. Latex allergy was diagnosed on the basis of immunoglobulin E results and/or positive skin-prick tests. Results The prevalence of latex sensitization was higher in group A than in group B (15/294, 5.1% vs. 5/294, 1.7%; P < 0.05). A significant difference in specific immunoglobulin E serum concentration was noted between pregnant and nonpregnant patients who had a positive fluorescent enzyme immunoassay test (median serum concentration: 1.93 kilounits/l; interquartile range = 2.28 vs. 0.78 kilounits/l; interquartile range = 1.07; P less than 0.05). Two patients in group A experienced an anaphylactic reaction to latex. Statistical analysis disclosed no association between latex sensitization and accepted risk factor for latex allergy. Conclusions The authors report a higher prevalence of latex sensitization in the obstetric population than in nonpregnant subjects undergoing gynecologic surgery.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference30 articles.

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Anaphylaxis in Risky Populations;Current Pharmaceutical Design;2023-01

2. Anaphylaxis and Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Call for Public Health Actions;The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice;2021-12

3. State-of-the-Art on Biomarkers for Anaphylaxis in Obstetrics;Life;2021-08-24

4. Comparative epidemiology of suspected perioperative hypersensitivity reactions;British Journal of Anaesthesia;2019-07

5. Maternal cardiac arrest;Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology;2019-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3