Impact of as Needed Heparin Boluses on Supratherapeutic Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time in Patients Managed With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Author:

Corcoran Delaney M.1,Kovacevic Mary P.1,Dell’Orfano Heather1,Sylvester Katelyn W.1,Connors Jean M.2

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Pharmacy

2. Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA.

Abstract

Introduction: Brigham and Women’s Hospital historically used titratable weight-based heparin nomograms with as needed boluses managed by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation specialists to achieve a predetermined goal-activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Due to concern amongst providers that as needed boluses may lead to supratherapeutic aPTT’s and subsequent bleeding, new nomograms without as needed boluses were implemented. The purpose of this retrospective observational analysis is to provide a comparison in safety and efficacy between the heparin nomograms with as needed boluses and the new nomograms without boluses. Methods: Adult patients who were cannulated on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and initiated on an approved heparin bolus nomogram (January 1, 2018–December 31, 2019) or an approved heparin no-bolus nomogram (October 20, 2020–March 31, 2021) were screened for inclusion. The major endpoint evaluated was the percentage of supratherapeutic aPTTs, defined as an aPTT above the upper limit of the specified nomogram goal, within the first 72 hours. Results: A total of 23 patients were included in the bolus nomogram cohort and 9 patients in the no-bolus nomogram cohort. Within the first 72 hours of initiation, there were 11.5% supratherapeutic aPTTs in the bolus group and 5.1% in the no-bolus group (P = 0.101). Overall there was 1 bleeding event in the no-bolus group (11.1%) and 7 in the bolus group (30.4%) (P = 0.26). There were no thromboembolic events in either group. Conclusions: Overall, there was no difference found in the percentage of supratherapeutic aPTTs within the first 72 hours of heparin initiation between the bolus and no-bolus nomograms.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3