Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
2. School of Medicine, Imperial College London, England
3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
Abstract
ObjectivesTo compare postoperative tympanoplasty outcomes between active versus inactive otitis media (OM) patients with tympanic membrane perforation.Databases ReviewedMedline via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for studies published from inception to March 1, 2023.MethodsStudies of 15- to 60-year-old patients undergoing microscopic/endoscopic myringoplasty using underlay/overlay technique with reported postoperative mean hearing gain and graft uptake were included. Studies requiring simultaneous surgical procedures, reporting patients with comorbidities and with non-English full text articles were excluded. Articles were independently screened by two researchers with data extracted according to a predetermined proforma in Microsoft Excel. Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment was used for risk of bias evaluation of randomized studies and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions for nonrandomized studies. Similar studies were pooled for meta-analysis using the inverse variance random effects model to calculate the mean difference and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for mean hearing gain and DerSimonian and Laird random effects model for graft uptake.ResultsThirty-three studies comprising 2,373 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, seven were pooled for meta-analysis. Included articles showed inactive OM patients have higher average postoperative mean hearing gain of 10.84 dB and graft uptake of 88.7% compared to active OM patients (9.15 dB and 84.2%). Meta-analysis of mean hearing gain (MD, –0.76 dB; 95% CI, −2.11 to 0.60;p= 0.27, moderate certainty) and graft uptake (OD, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34–1.09;p= 0.10, moderate certainty) have an overallpvalue >0.05.ConclusionThere were no statistically significant differences in postoperative mean hearing gain and graft uptake between active and inactive OM patients undergoing tympanoplasty. Hence, tympanoplasty procedures should not be postponed solely because of patients' preoperative ear discharge status.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Sensory Systems,Otorhinolaryngology
Reference49 articles.
1. A review on the history of tympanoplasty;Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2013
2. Evaluation of the role of middle ear risk index as a prognostic tool in cases of tympanoplasty in chronic suppurative otitis media;International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology And Head And Neck Surgery,2021
3. The wound healing response to grafted tissues;Otolaryngol Clin North Am,1994
4. Dilemmas in Current Management of Complicated Chronic Otitis Media;Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2019
5. Antibiotic treatment of acute otorrhea through tympanostomy tube: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study with daily follow-up;Pediatrics,2003